Carmaine Bennett of the Toronto area was recently interviewed and denied any involvement as she confirmed that she was arrested for criminal malfeasance at her last place of employment involving Corporate theft of resources. She was detained. She is now being investigated for business interference and intent to commit murder as related to a trucking company and a consulting business. She has collected more than $40,000.00 on the suggestion that she is working for the company. She is not working for anyone.
Angel Ronan SPQL and the monkey who cannot sue and nor can the monkey take a photo: A monkey is not a legal person and nor can it be although we do protect animals under the law in terms of preventing inhumane physical animal abuse. We also protect vehicles and their owners. The time taken on this case should be used to review the protection of music artists on I Tunes and Youtube to ensure they are getting their royalties as I Tunes and U Tube make trillions on each play with the sale of commercials. The final answer is that the monkey, even though we are sympathetic, is not a legal person as to own property or to appear before the court as a person with standing before the Court to petition on any issue so no judgement can be entered in the monkey's favor. The monkey, quite simply, cannot own property. What do you want the court fi do? What do you want me fi do ? More importantly, the anyalimal cannot be said to have had the requisite creative capacity and intention t…
Please select "Comment" at the bottom of this post or email the post to firstname.lastname@example.org with your name, phone number, address and email contact details. Also, send payment by interac to the same address. Select the email function at the bottom of the article.
Warren first delved into this issue in 1997 and again in 1999 during discussions in Tort law tutorials with Dr. Andrew Huxley; an excellent teacher. These issues were also discussed in light of various trials in the history of England. There was some mention of the OJ Simpson scenario but there are some dissimilarities. The purpose of the the legal principles in the criminal law is to ensure everyone is safe from arbitrary detention. This is for the safety of the little people who live in public housing and golf couse owners who live on 5 acre estates who could be held up at his front door by 5 off duty train drivers who feel really official.
A new article will discuss the jurisprudence of competing oaths which could be unique to the more provincial common law jurisdiction. The issue is that if the matter cannot be proven on the evidence as necessary with proof of the two requisite elements, then the matter should be withdrawn according to R. vs. King(1962) SCC; a most hono…
Taking a legally pluralist stance which reflects global socio-legal reality, this article first identifies significant
mental blockages for legal scholars in theorising legal pluralism. It then argues that a socially responsible approach to
law teaching, not only in India, cannot ignore society, culture and competing value systems. If law is everywhere
dynamic and internally plural, even if not immediately visible, acknowledging pluralisms becomes necessarily a highly
dynamic activity, comparable to the challenges of kite flying: One wrong move, and the subtle structure crashes. Unless
law teaching takes pluralism seriously, legal education will empower only a few privileged actors, capable to
manipulate law and its multiple power-related uses. Socially conscious approaches to law teaching must problematise
that while we nee…