Skip to main content

Posts

It is suggested by many in its celebrated closing and burial that The Law Society of Upper Canada was founded by a bum and was run by bums or it was taken over by bums when the good men went to war to fight for our freedoms abroad. Stay home and fight the real war. In any event, We have hopes for the Law Society of Ontario in general. The report you see here involves some of the problems with racializing but also with hunger in Ontario and with insufficient training among those who wish to be involved in the provision of legal services. We cannot have two sets of professional groups chewing on the same rope but failing to achieve anything constructive before the Court. Those untrained part 5 rule actors need to abide by the same rules of professional conduct when rules of Court are involved or any requests involving Court business and the scheduling of motions. Those who passed the bar exam find that the untrained set of participants do not know the rules and nor do they cooperate with the higher standards of professionalism. What is really going on is just inconvenience for the Court and those who are trying to serve their clients. Angel Ronan(TM) has proposed a new training scheme that all could participate in even if you are a convict. Click here for more.

   It is suggested by many in its celebrated closing and burial that The Law Society of Upper Canada was founded by a bum and was run by bums or it was taken over by bums when the good men went to war to fight for our freedoms abroad.  Stay home and fight the real war.  In any event,  We have hopes for the Law Society of Ontario in general.  The report you see here involves some of the problems with racializing but also with hunger in Ontario and with insufficient training among those who wish to be involved in the  provision of legal services.  We cannot have two sets of professional groups chewing on the same rope but failing to achieve anything constructive before the Court. Those untrained part 5 rule actors need to abide by the same rules of professional conduct when rules of Court are involved or any requests involving Court business and the scheduling of motions.  Those who passed the bar exam find that the untrained set of participant...

Click here. It could be a Huguenot habit to interrupt the Kings government to get attention, block his administration to see what he would do. The Verdict of History The Huguenots eventually "got away with it" for nearly a century because they had the military power to back up their obstruction. Modern politicians "get away with it" because the legal system is designed to give them the benefit of the doubt regarding their intent. This is even when they conspire to kill the King and his heirs for a parallel intended future involving another potential young King and foreign former entertainer Queen, maybe some other son, that might be sharing the front pages of the newspaper with them every day and promising everyone that they will get what they want although these persons are not registered as his intended in his written, recorded plans. It is already officially written and decided. There is not a y challenger. He has communicated the same to the world to ensure there is no blocage or scheming with a presumptuous retired politician gay named Johnny Lord of Stoke something or the other. So just forget about it. He is here for good and his system works. This historical comparison is fascinating because it highlights exactly how "obstruction" can be used as a political weapon. You are describing what historians often call the Huguenot "State within a State." While modern politicians might use bureaucracy or filibusters, the Huguenots (French Protestants) in the 16th and 17th centuries took "dereliction of duty" and "blocking the administration" to an extreme level to force the King’s hand.

Click here.    It could be a Huguenot habit to interrupt the Kings government to get attention, block his administration to see what he would do. The Verdict of History The Huguenots eventually "got away with it" for nearly a century because they had the military power to back up their obstruction. Modern politicians "get away with it" because the legal system is designed to give them the benefit of the doubt regarding their intent. This is even when they conspire to kill the King and his heirs for a parallel intended future involving another potential young King and foreign former entertainer Queen, maybe some other son, that might be sharing the front pages of the newspaper with them every day and promising  everyone that they will get what they want although these persons are not registered as his intended in his written, recorded plans. It is already officially written and decided. There is not a y challenger. He has communicated the same to the world to ensure ...

In Canada, the principle you are touching on—that the government must apply the law equally—is a cornerstone of the legal system, specifically protected under Section 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. However, it is important to distinguish between administrative/civil liability and criminal prosecution. Under the current Canadian legal framework, an arbitrary or unequal interruption of benefits does not typically lead to a criminal prosecution of government employees unless specific criminal intent (like fraud or bribery) is proven.

  In Canada, the principle you are touching on—that the government must apply the law equally—is a cornerstone of the legal system, specifically protected under Section 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. However, it is important to distinguish between administrative/civil liability and criminal prosecution. Under the current Canadian legal framework, an arbitrary or unequal interruption of benefits does not typically lead to a criminal prosecution of government employees unless specific criminal intent (like fraud or bribery) is proven. 1. Equality Under the Law (The Charter) If a government program pays $2,500 to one postal code and nothing to another without a valid legislative reason, it would likely be challenged under Section 15(1), which guarantees the "equal benefit of the law without discrimination."  * The Remedy: If a court finds a program is arbitrary or unequal, the standard remedy is a Judicial Review. The court can strike down the unfair rule, order the g...

Get a hot milk shake at Frost Byte(TM). Use this logo for $85.00 per day; paid every day. Call us today. After 30 years, you own it. We would keep only two locations. We are now offering exclusive distributorships in some West Indian Islands. Frost Byte™: This offer is made first and foremost to my siblings since we are not the sad bastards. Buy the whole franchise concept and chain and own it forever by paying us $85.00 per day for 40 years and you will get a document confirming your exclusive distributorship for the name in your state or province once you have paid all the monies.

   Use this logo for $85.00 per day; paid every day. Call us today. After 30 years, you own it.   We would keep only two locations. We are now offering exclusive distributorships in some West Indian Islands. Frost Byte™: This offer is made first and foremost to my siblings since we are not the sad bastards. Buy the whole franchise concept and chain and own it forever by paying us $85.00 per day for 40 years and you will get a document confirming your exclusive distributorship for the name in your state or province once you have paid all the monies. You will be able to open additional new locations once you sign and start payment. The agreement also involves payment of $60.00 (3 $20.00 notes) per day for the inaugural location with a yearly 2% increase. This amount is to be paid by the individual franchise owner. All subsequent locations will pay 120.00 per day with a 2% yearly increase.  After ten years you will continue to pay $100.00 per day per location. Than...

Click here. In Canada, if a provincial government paid a monthly cash stipend to residents of specific cities (Oshawa, Oakville, etc.) but excluded Toronto, the legal challenge would rest on Section 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and Administrative Law principles regarding "arbitrariness." The law does not require every person in a province to receive identical benefits at all times since some may receive disability top ups etc but it strictly prohibits the government from making distinctions that are discriminatory or irrational.

  Angel Ronan SHOKUNIN Reports by Angel Ronan SLRP.  Click here.    In Canada, if a provincial government paid a monthly cash stipend to residents of specific cities (Oshawa, Oakville, etc.) but excluded Toronto, the legal challenge would rest on Section 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms and Administrative Law principles regarding "arbitrariness." The law does not require every person in a province to receive identical benefits at all times since some may receive disability top ups etc but it strictly prohibits the government from making distinctions that are discriminatory or irrational. 1. The Charter Challenge (Section 15) The primary law is Section 15(1), which guarantees the "equal benefit of the law." However, this has a specific legal hurdle:  * Geographic Discrimination: In cases like R. v. Turpin and Siemens v. Manitoba, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that "province of residence" or "geographic location" is not an automatic ...

The Heritage Law Centre is starting at the JCA as sponsored by Dr. Pamela Appellate and supported by the Black Church in Toronto. Call or email us for more information or contact the JCA. Send an email to info.angelronan@mail.com.

  The Heritage Law Centre is starting at the JCA as sponsored by  Dr. Pamela  Appellate and supported by the Black Church in Toronto.   Call or email us for more information or contact the JCA. Send an email to info.angelronan@mail.com.  We are open for appointments five days a week at the Hullmark Centre by appointment phone 647-485-5206 or by email to heritagelawcentre@gmail.com. We follow something called P.J.  This stands for Positive Justice.  We are open for personal visits on Mondays, Wednesdays and Fridays from 1:00 pm to 3:00 pm at the JCA. On these days, the intake Directors and Volunteers will discuss with any groups or individuals any matters they may raise  for open answer and questions. Everyone  is given 15 minutes.  You must give us your email address and the basic nature of your problem before we start discussing anything with you.  This will be forwarded to the processing centre. Each attendant  seeking...