The greatest proponents of ''them and us'' capitalism are only Americans who are really engaged in systemic questions while they feel preserved by a force vs. force mentality that says they will always be productive if they parasite on someone or something belonging to another to kill, steal and destroy. This has nothing to do with the skull and bones symbol as used by illustrious societies, pirates and the evil Nazi German SS alike but the fact that there are systemic answers to the questions at the finger tips and on the speed dial or right down the road on your information super highway so that you would see how the solution of basic income enables a treasure trove of economic activity that protects the most important variable, the human variable, in the economic equation as essential and gives breath to generated resources such as the return on capital investments so that even if you wanted to steal from people or from the system, there is something from where; there is a system from which one could steal as basic income does not mean human nature, sin and error that may be bent toward killing stealing and destroying is going away. Yet, the basic income is just some energy.. a little money guaranteed per citizen yearly, that is to say, to keep the wheels of the economic system turning round and round when there is less money per citizen on average due to the industrial automation. It is not a lot of money and it will be spent; $60,000.00 per year is proposed to see the European or the Asian economic buoyant escapade and just exactly what is happening in Some Parts of North America right now who have submitted to the UDHR in principle as not to be a rogue jurisdiction within a rogue state jurisdiction. So, who would seek acceptance from Europe and then hesitate to put in the final solution provided by Europe when acceptance is not based on physical attributes as to kinship, black or white, but obedience? It is the pirate grendel cave dweller who is always in between the two opinions; always emerging from the independence of the cave, the freedom of the cave and cave ownership vs. promises in the written Declarations of Independence , the guaranteed 'Constitutional' freedoms of society and its various rules as to property and property protection and ownership who is confessing his indentured servant ancestry and his struggle in between the two opinions that has led to his 9 ancestral crimes vs. the ten commandments in our midst who has become the more suave wool suited, Cadillac driving fast talking cotton gin and barb wire sales man. His hands and feet are big and he is quick witted just as his people were at the OK coral where the power of one man's six shooter resisteth the tranquility, quiet farm life and power of another. But, does he believe, really believe, we should respect the ten commandments or the constitution of the United States and the Magna Carta as based upon them or is it that the Kingdom of Heaven suffers violence and the violent takes your farm by force while in the Father's house there are many mansions? The wrong answer here renders us in continual civil war and only in North America or in the Western hemisphere where this debate continues and only in the Western hemisphere but not all men with big hands and feet are involved in this debate. Some people with big hands and feet are quite settled and prosperous with the answer. So, what we have learned is that fighting and dying for civil liberties is tremendous at home and abroad but the what liberties and what declaration of independence and what constitution are we fighting for when the words independence, liberty and constitution have a different agenda and import for the residual people of the cave who could be well suited politicians in America now since 1774 and who may have had a different agenda as against the colonialists who arrived from Europe with the same quiet expectations as a Miguel who showed up from Mexico or maybe from Argentina that were settled in the 1500's and where law and order was maintained in public and private business matters. Miguel arrived with his Puritan Red Headed Latino Anglo wife in 1836 in New Mexico. See Miguel's story in the Movie Sweet Water with Ed Harris. See the full article at www.theangelronanissue.wordpress.com.

The greatest proponents of ''them and us'' capitalism are only Americans who are really engaged in systemic questions while they feel preserved by a force vs. force mentality that says they will always be productive if they parasite on someone or something belonging to another to kill, steal and destroy.  This has nothing to do with the skull and bones symbol as used by illustrious societies, pirates and the evil Nazi German SS alike but the fact that there are systemic answers to the questions at the finger tips and on the speed dial or right down the road on your information super highway so that  you would see  how the solution of basic income enables a treasure trove of economic activity that protects the most important variable, the human variable, in the economic equation as essential  and gives breath to generated resources such as the return on capital investments so that even if you wanted to steal from people or from the system, there is something from where; there is a system from which one could steal as basic income does not mean human nature, sin and error that may be bent toward killing stealing and destroying  is going away.  Yet, the basic income is just some energy.. a little  money guaranteed per citizen yearly, that is to say, to keep the wheels of the  economic system  turning round and round when there is less money per citizen on average due to the industrial automation.  It is not a lot of money and it will be spent; $60,000.00 per year is proposed to see the European or the Asian economic buoyant  escapade and just exactly what is happening in Some Parts of North America right now who have submitted to the UDHR in principle as not to be a rogue jurisdiction within a rogue state jurisdiction.     So, who would seek acceptance from Europe and then hesitate to put in the final solution provided by Europe when acceptance is not based on physical attributes as to kinship, black or white,  but obedience?      It is the  pirate grendel cave dweller who is always in between the two opinions; always emerging from the independence of the cave, the freedom of the cave and cave ownership vs.   promises in the written Declarations of Independence , the guaranteed  'Constitutional' freedoms of society and its various rules as to property and property protection and  ownership who is  confessing his  indentured servant ancestry and his struggle in between the two opinions that has led to his 9  ancestral crimes vs. the ten commandments in our midst who has become  the more suave wool suited, Cadillac driving  fast talking cotton gin and barb wire sales man. His hands and feet are big and he is quick witted just as his people were at the OK coral where the power of one man's six shooter resisteth the tranquility, quiet  farm life and power of another. But, does he believe, really believe, we should respect the ten commandments or the constitution of the United States and the Magna Carta as based upon them or is it that the Kingdom of Heaven suffers violence and the violent takes your farm by force while in the Father's house there are many mansions?    The wrong answer here renders us in continual civil war and only in North America or in the Western hemisphere where this debate continues and only in the Western hemisphere but not all men with big hands and feet are involved in this debate. Some people with big hands and feet are quite settled and prosperous with the answer.

So, what we have learned is that fighting and dying for civil liberties is tremendous at home and abroad but the what liberties and what declaration of independence and what constitution are we fighting for when the words independence, liberty and constitution have a different agenda and import for the residual people of the cave who could be well suited politicians in America now since 1774 and who may have had a different agenda as against the colonialists who arrived from Europe with the same quiet expectations as a Miguel who showed up from Mexico or maybe from Argentina that were settled in the 1500's and where law and order was maintained in public and private business matters.   Miguel arrived with his Puritan Red Headed Latino Anglo wife in 1836 in New Mexico.   See Miguel's story in the Movie Sweet Water with Ed Harris.




See the full article at www.theangelronanissue.wordpress.com.