Skip to main content

Please note that the Laws of England and Wales are immediately applicable in Canada; including the Common Law under the Criminal Code of Canada. The new exam question is as follows: Mr. Smith works at a hardware store. He worked there for 10 years with a young female who was always about 16 years old although she was really about 43 years old when he started working there. She had a dream about James Bond coming to the shop and being the new manager and teaching her how to use the...tools and the...drill bits and how to cool down the drill hole when it got...hot. After her dream, there were two police man who showed up at the shop to say her emotional readings from her mobile start phone said she was unusually emotional and she was about to pop since the dream was just...bewildering. She said nothing happened. In fact, she said he did not teach her any...of his skill..with his drill. It was just a dream and that she was really involved in a family Court battle but she needed a raise so she would like to make a statement against her co-worker who, while at work, was always on video in the separate customer booth and never actually spoke to her except but to say hello and good bye. Her name was Coy Ote. His name was She Epdog. He never touched her hands and only waived. He was charged with EQUAL assault...I mean sexual assault. James Bond showed up an arrested her for her allegation as the wise policeman. Can the Crown prove their case? Please discuss the elements of the offense. For bonus points, please discuss if the accused is guilty. Please see the answer on Tuesday. The above question raises a variety of issues in the laws involving offenses against the person. It raises the issues of assault in particular. The issue of uttering false statements is also raised. There is a very long and complete exam answer available. However, we must first agree that the compete answer regardless of the requisite and complete jurisprudential answer is that nothing happened. The accuser is not a victim. There is no need to discuss the actus reus and mens rea of the alleged offense where the actus reus is the unlawful touching of another. Touching is unlawful if the alleged victim has not consented. Accidental touching is also an offense as the requisite mens rea for assault is mere recklessness according to R vs. Palmer, R v. Savage and R v. Parmenter. These elements of the offense would have to be proven to satisfy the Crown onus according to R v. King and R v. Legere. Warren studied hard so he wouldn't embarrass his grandmother in Court. Levelsland said he would do anything not to be Jamaican. The other offenses disclosed by this set of facts are the Deception offense and the Contempt of Court. The actus reus involves the provision of false information with intent to deceive, mislead and pervert the course of justice. To purport that there is no criminal offense being committed in the evident non provision of basic income to all Canadians is an example. It is an offense. It would also be a perversion of the course of justice to and neglect of duty contrary to s.219(1) not to arrest those responsible. Contempt of Court involves any and all activity that brings the Court into disrepute. This is the short but complete answer and keep in mind that this does not diminish the sensitivity of the allegations.

Please note that the Laws of England and Wales are immediately applicable in Canada; including the Common Law under the Criminal Code of Canada. The new exam question is as follows:    Mr. Smith works at a hardware store.  He worked there for 10 years with a young female who was always about 16 years old although she was really about 43 years old  when he started working there. She had a dream about James Bond coming to the shop and being the new manager and teaching her how to use the...tools and the...drill bits and how to cool down the drill hole when it got...hot.  After her dream, there were two police man who showed up at the shop to say her emotional readings from her mobile start phone said she was unusually emotional and she was about to pop since the dream was just...bewildering.  She said nothing happened. In fact, she said he did not teach her any...of his skill..with his drill.    It was just a dream and that she was really involved in a family Court battle but she needed a raise so she would like to make a statement against her co-worker who, while at work, was always on video in the separate customer booth and never actually spoke to her except but to say hello and good bye. Her name was Coy Ote. His name was She Epdog. He never touched her hands and only waived. He was charged with EQUAL assault...I mean sexual assault.   James Bond showed up an arrested her for her allegation as the wise policeman.  Can the Crown prove their case? Please discuss the elements of the offense. For bonus points, please discuss if the accused is guilty.    Please see the answer on Tuesday.    The above question raises a variety of issues in the laws involving offenses against the person. It raises the issues of assault in particular. The issue of uttering false statements is also raised.  There is a very long and complete exam answer available. However, we must first agree that the compete answer regardless of the requisite and complete jurisprudential answer is that nothing happened. The accuser is not a victim. There is no need to discuss the actus reus and mens rea of the alleged offense where the actus reus  is the unlawful touching of another. Touching is unlawful if the alleged victim has not consented. Accidental touching is also an offense as the requisite mens rea for assault is mere recklessness according to R vs. Palmer,  R v. Savage and R v. Parmenter. These elements of the offense would have to be proven to satisfy the Crown onus according to R v. King and R v. Legere.  Warren studied hard so he wouldn't embarrass his grandmother in Court. Levelsland said he would do anything not to be Jamaican.    The other offenses  disclosed by this set of facts are  the Deception offense and the Contempt of Court. The actus reus involves the provision of false information with intent to deceive, mislead and pervert the course of justice.  To purport that there is no criminal offense being committed in the evident non provision of basic income to all Canadians is an example.  It is an offense. It would also be a perversion of the course of justice to and neglect of duty contrary to s.219(1)  not to arrest those responsible. Contempt of Court involves any and all activity that brings the Court into disrepute.    This is the short but complete  answer and keep in mind that this does not diminish the sensitivity of the allegations.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

See us on Angel Ronan Entwerfen(TM). We are also SDGCK now. We help Black people. Call to contact us for assistance at our Advice Centre. We help you via the internet. Call and leave us a message at 647-485-5206. Its important that you leave a message. You do not have to make a donation but one is requested. Its free to Jehovah Witness members and is more detailed and thorough than any other service. We can hold your documents and assist you through the whole process. We help White, Black, Yellow, Red and Brown people. Ask for Pam or Lineeka. Write us at info.angelronan@mail.com.

   We help Black people. Call to contact us for assistance at our Advice Centre.  We help you via the internet.  Call and leave us a message at 647-485-9558. Its important  that you leave a message.  You do not have to make a donation but one is requested.  Its free to Jehovah Witness members and is more  detailed and thorough than any other service.  We can hold your documents and assist you through the whole process.    We help White, Black,  Yellow,  Red and Brown people.   Ask for Pam or Liteeka or Corinne.  

Click here. Lets make North America great again. Angel Ronan Entwerfen Journal: Creolism vs Certainty: Creolism vs Certainty; an Angel Ronan Toshokan Report # 8. Written by Warren Lyon and Seiehaeh Mottha with notes from Eiam Dawn and Craig Daniels. August 7th, 2025. There is a current member of the US House of Representatives and also the the Congress who has not received any income support benefit. There is a member of the Canadian parliament who has not received any income support benefit; probably from Toronto or Peel. The governor of Virginia( part Dutch and part American Native) who was later appointed the Governor of Jamaica arrived at Kingston Harbour in 1664 with his assistant from Vermont. They were both relatively young but the servant was a boy really! about 16 years old but he was capably trained for all tasks. They travelled to Jamaica and when they arrived and got settled the governor cut the boy's foot off to be sure that the boy could not leave and would always be there to provide help and assistance, a part of the governors methods, making the boy kind of a nameless faceless automaton that needs you...just as much as you need him to help you, be there to help you and where would he go, what would he do? But the boy is only one person. Maybe ten are better than one since if one falls down the other nine can help you up. The boy buried his emotions and learned it was best to stay pleasant and never look like anyone had done something to him. What is it like working for someone that you really do detest but you have few options to do anything else; the way this culture works? Nonetheless, he learned to find a passive aggressive way to feel heard, acknowledged or equal by spitting in the food he cooked and served to his employer or any drinks he was asked to prepare so that he could say"...I am you...and you are me" so when you are with your wife or servant girl the odds are you know we could say to the child "...you know I could be your.." and we all have to work hard. Eventually, the governor and the servant boy became washed out by a storm and they learned how to adapt and survive together...as friends but also as servant and master. The governor tended to rely on that one servant as the only one he really knows. The boy was the only one he really knows. He is just a boy. As a Vermontonian, he expected payment for work. The payment did not happen but he was given compliments and reassurance that he would always be his....boy. The man also cut his face to make him kind of faceless and so the boy put wax on the spot. The boy tried to plan a wedding celebration with the servant girl like what he read in the bible and the marooned governor got very angry and behaved badly until the girl his and then the governor said its just that he needed all the boy's attention, needed his help. The governor burned the servant's Vermont citizenship documents to make him kind of nameless. The boy learned other ways to express his feelings. Expression is everything. Slavery was considered unnatural by the Romans under Justinian law. See the "Corpus Juris Civilis". Steven Hawking agrees. Money and Labour The motive behind commerce is money. The motive behind the 14th amendment is commerce and money. We want everyone to benefit equally when they have contributed equally. There is no other way. We could accept that all kinds of human labor became increasingly redundant due to new labor saving technology. We also save money on what the machine does for us. Now that there are fewer people working due to machinery doing work, we find we have less products sold. This is ironic as the products were made by machines with intent to make more profit. So, we decided to give everybody a little money, not a lot, to be sure we make the profit. The little money we give everyone is taken from consumer tax dollars. The money used to retrofit the factories with robots and machines is also taken from consumer tax dollars. When you have black children and white children, you want them to benefit equally in your country and also on your golf course. That is what a good father would do or would he instill a White hegemony since in his story book from the 1700's in Jamaica, he did not really see you in the book as a Moor Berber Priest in England, Italy, in France or Holland or as the architect. But, I suppose its just a book. All we are trying to find is( ..not 11000 votes but...) 11 cents a minute per citizen( 20 cents is preferred ) in North America as the minimum , enforced basic and standard amount of income support. We adapt new phone technology, home appliance technology, food preparation technology where you can just add watts or water to make the pudding or the Cake and we also adapt new humans-less AI work technology and so we adapt money as technology so we can acquire all the other various technologies that make life comfortable. Money as technology is the priority above and beyond all other technologies. Money is technology. In quick summary, watching the US presidencies and American political news television is like seeing a Court jester distracting you from the real issues like comparably equal income support money across North America to assist in balancing out consumer stimulus across the country and to ensure effective profit returns in all states or markets. This is while he hides his own intrinsic pain.

  Click here.    Lets make North America great again.    Angel Ronan Entwerfen Journal: Creolism vs Certainty:    Creolism vs Certainty; an Angel Ronan Toshokan Report # 8. Written by Warren Lyon  and Seiehaeh Mottha   with notes from Eiam Dawn and Craig Daniels.   August 7th, 2025.  There is a current member of the US House of Representatives and also the the Congress who has not received any income support benefit. There is a member of the Canadian parliament who has not received any income support benefit; probably from Toronto or Peel. The governor of Virginia( part Dutch and part American Native) who was later appointed the Governor of Jamaica arrived at Kingston Harbour in 1664 with his assistant from Vermont.  They were both relatively young but the servant was a boy really! about 16 years old but he was capably trained for all tasks. They travelled to Jamaica and when they arrived and got settled the...

Angel Ronan's New York Contact!