- 19/01/2024.
- The proposals from the Law Society of Canada to the Law Society of Ontario.
- We say the lawyer is white..... sometimes. Racialism and racialised treatment of individuals in the profession has been frowned upon, identified as endemic and systemic at the former Law Society of Upper Can. and now how do we compensate the victims of this human rights issue? We propose a reinstatement of all licenses affected in this toxic, harassing environment. We propose compensation of $70,000.00 to all individuals who were licensees under that disbanded, corrupt racially ignorant, partial regime.
- We should look at this and see what this racialism entailed. It involved legal consequences for the Tort of the Loss of Reputation, emotional distress, admission of charter breaches contrary S.15 of the Charter. We can disband the Law Society and change it's name but it's obvious that many, all of us are deserving compensation for these admissions of wrong.
- In addition, we cannot have two sets of professional groups chewing on the same rope but failing to achieve anything constructive before the Court. Those untrained "part 5 rule" actors need to abide by the same rules of professional conduct when rules of Court are involved or any requests involving Court business and the scheduling of motions or applications or trials. It makes Court business difficult. Those who passed the bar exam find that the untrained set of participants do not know the rules and nor do they cooperate with the higher standards of professionalism or cooperation on matters that might require some discussion to schedule an application. The untrained and unlicensed may have bribed their way and also "knife wielding abused and threatened" the qualified real Law Society graduates and counsel. The bribe is the only qualification and those who rely and insist on the rules an on really helping people are stabbed. There is some determined anthropology here.
- It says "Please help".
- The current notion of a formal qualification process decoys what is really happening and the existence of this unqualified unlicensed junta. But, soon we will all have a licence and will be trained and will have standing to help people in all areas of law. What is really going on is just inconvenience for the Court and for those who are trying to serve their clients. Angel Ronan(TM) has proposed a new training scheme that all could participate in even if you are a convict. Even convicts like Falconrere (son of orphan Oliver turned the murderer Scrooge) will be able to get his licence and attend Court. Those who intend to really help people will do so and not attempt to racketeer legal services for a few dollars more. This is more easily achieved as all citizens will receive a paltry $300.00 per day as income support that is paid monthly. This works out to $109500.00 per year. You don't need to be involved in what you are doing to make money. You have money. The income support per Canadian is now set at no less than $70,000.00 per year. That is about $8.40 per hour every hour in a year. This is the deal we make with ourselves. Some of us will just do other interesting things instead of slogging it out with mountains of files and you are not really helping anyone. I think I will rent a beach in the Eastern Caribbean and hope to see 20 people arrive every week at my unique beach house location, paying me $800.00 for the week.
- It's not being paid to all Canadians regardless of location but all Canadians are paying into this pool of national funds through the harmonised sales tax that are to be redistributed equally. It's not being redistributed equally at present.
- This way, you cannot say money and your need for it is the reason why you abuse the file and the client or the time it reasonably takes to read a file and dispense with the natter as Law Society rules require. You are not under any rules. Warren is going to court again and helping people. He abides by the rules his training has enabled him to uphold. He did nothing wrong and you affirm this is so. You certainly have. Maybe you chose to protect him from the worst of your own anthropology where ever it may arise. You cannot say if everyone of you has repented yet from your ways. You know you don't really want to help people get out of their problems. You don't really help. You don't intend to help. You don't want to go to school. You don't want to submit to any formal identification of your activities. So, since there are soo many of you as you kill more often and faster than the average human, we have made a deal with your anthropology. But, as you do what you do, you should not act like anyone beat you in Court when they were just reading the file and helping their client. You admit they did so successfully.
- You have confirmed Warren, as of 2017, is a member in good standing. The settlement offer was stolen from the mail. Then, the Law Society was disbanded.
- It involves ongoing CPD training for everyone and;
- With respect to practice in Canada, All English Law graduates from the UK, Europe and Ireland will be exempt from any accreditation. However, they will have to participate, like all others, in a 5 year provisional licensing/CPD program and can practice entirely on their own during the five years of the program. They would only have to report what work and files they are involved in during the licensing program. After the license is granted, there is ongoing mandatory CPD afterwards.
- They are encouraged to join paid or unpaid traineeships during their five year program.
- For those who choose the law profession and only have High School education or No education of any kind, it is a ten year licensing/CPD program. They have to be at least 18 years old. They can also practice on their own but are encouraged to find a traineeship or studentship. No one can fail. All the courses are free.
- Those individuals who have experience as legal service providers but no formal education of any kind, no Law degree or paralegal qualification, will be granted a 2 year provisional licence and can practice entirely on their own during the two years of the program. But have to confirm/ report their attendances at Court in an online log. There is ongoing mandatory CPD afterwards. No one can fail.
- Existing BCL Common Law Law Society graduates from any Common Law country in the world are exempt with evidence of their graduation certificate at any time in history and will be granted a full license upon approaching the regulatory body for the requisite membership. No one is excluded for any reason due to the evidence of the racialised abuse of power and abuse of discretion.
- You can never lose your licence. You only pay a fine if you are in breach of the rules. You continue with CPD. You could also be charged for criminal wrong doing such as theft of client funds.
- This is all designed to acknowledge some unruly anthropology that does not really want to go to school, does not really want to help anyone and does not seem to really want a licence out of some resentment of formalities, responsibility and identification that took over the legal profession as domestic workers when their employers went to war.
- All participants; they have to make a statement of truth about any existing convictions; if any and they can proceed so long as the statement is truthful. But they will have to take on-going mandatory cpd (continuing professional development) in the same programs taken by everyone else any way every year that will involve courses in the 3rd year of the Licensing/CPD program and above as mandatory but they can take the 1st and 2nd year courses if they wish. The program has 10 levels. You must attend every year while you are a member. You can resign your licence if you wish. For any complaints, you do not lose your licence but the situation is reviewed and you may get a yellow or red card. You pay a fine between $2000.00 and $10,000.00 if red carded. If you choose to dispute it, the matter ends up in a special impartial session of the HRTO marked as a Law Society matter dealt with by presumedly racially impartial HRTO adjudication. If there is criminal activity in the red card scenario, you may end up before the criminal court and convicted. But, you do not lose your licence. Most of the people involved in law in Ontario are the offspring DNA of one or two particular butler criminals who occupied barrister homes and killed their families as the barrister good church member went to war in 1939; for God and country. They threaten the good and the well intentioned. They have law files and offices but are not members of the Law Society; never were. They use clients as fodder to get more honor and experience although the file says the woman is innocent and cannot be convicted but you set a jury trial without her consent or request and you have no formal legal training as you scare those people out of the profession and steal their files to say they need everyone to feel equal. This is due to the ongoing problems with an unqualified vs. qualified vendetta vindication tendency that has "creole Anglo" messed up the whole industry (most legal Aid duty counsel are drop outs); in addition to racialism in the law society's previous self administration and it's failure to pay compensation to all victims of that administration that includes the staff in spite of the Law Society's failures and findings, its closure and renaming.
- This is so for everyone and sometimes there will be people in your program or course who are just new arrivals and who have never had multiple public Court achievements like Warren as a BCL graduate.
- . But, a hungry jurisdiction where people who do not receive sufficient income support is an unusual jurisdiction with lots of huckster snake oil salesman things going on as if you have to act like you need to hurt someone and commit a crime to eat while showing some disdain for the Monarch and the Court as if he does not exist, as if he owes you his seat as you abuse the Court. I would prefer Law in Boston or Chicago Illinois where all citizens receive an income support of no less than $30,000.00 in Chicago Illinois or $50,000.00 in Boston, Mass. We see that in Canada, there is a harmonized sales tax and a gas tax but it is not getting back to all of us in equal quantities after we pay this money to the government. Some of us are getting $20,000.00 pcy Some get $50,000.00 pcy and some get more than this. Some get nothing. This is benefit inequality and there are cases that outline this as a problem like
- See Egan and Nesbit v. Canada, 2 Thibaudeau v. Canada (M.N.R.), 3and Miron v. Trudel.4. See also Fraser v Canada andGriggs v. Duke Power.Frazer and Griggs confirm that all discrimination in policyis illegal; not just in the employment context.See also the 14th amendment. The Equal Protection Clauseis part of the first sectionof the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.The clause, which took effect in 1868,provides "nor shall any State ... deny to any personwithin its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws."It mandates that individuals in similar situations be treatedequally by the law.[1][2][3]A primary motivation for this clause was to validatethe equality provisions contained in the Civil Rights Act of 1866,which guaranteed that all citizens would have theguaranteed right to equal protection by law.As a whole,the Fourteenth Amendment marked a large shift inAmerican constitutionalism, by applying substantially moreconstitutional restrictions against the states than hadapplied before the Civil War.https://www.doi.gov/sites/doi.gov/files/migrated/pmb/eeo/directives/upload/Civil-Rights-Directive-2011-01CProcedures-11_5_2010-wk.pdfThe Equality Act 2010 safeguards against inequalityin the UK and also Canada. See also the case of ; See also indirect discrimination in Essop and others v Home Office (UK Border Agency) [2017] UKSC 27 confirms thatindirect discrimination is wrong as per Essop in the provision of Government services.The Act is directly applicable in Canada based onthe BNA 1867.
- All citizens have an income support of $300.00 per day. Maybe you are too busy being happy with money to actually need to make money as Counsel but if someone needs help and they call you, you might take the whole file; maybe one file a year. But in places like Ronto in Tario, where there is no income support contrary to law, you need the file to eat and to pay the car payment and you try to keep the file open forever; milking it to just get by and its lousy. Maybe with the income support, you process faster and there will be another file I suppose and you are not too busy so you can say yes more often to really really help someone ; and you still feel big on a cruise ship as you say you are counsel with a quality service, reading the file with time to find the best answer for your client. This is what Angel Ronan does. You don't feel like them because you are hoarding the files and not really helping. Actually, you stole his also. The Judge who gets the file after the motion date is set in trial scheduling Court will have all the facts before him to decide if the matter is Res Judicata. Now, this could not have happened before in that woman's file because she had only attended a default judgment proceeding and the facts were never really dealt with in that proceeding. To say "Res judicata" was not only inappropriate in any hearing with only a default judgment on the table, its fraudulent really. We have not heard anything as to the facts where we could say, on the facts, that there is nothing new to the file with the matter already decided. We have never really opened the file. The woman has not had a chance to properly respond to the claim and have it dismissed as a fraud on the face of it with no case to answer.
- These CPD programs will be offered by universities also. Because of the evident genome backwardness and ongoing aboriginal resistance that is camouflaged by designer clothing, make up, nice watches, and good colognes, the programs will be free.
- Those who sign up and who do not have a law degree can take on a paralegal qualification with limited practice and obtain their full qualification as a five year participant. You can begin the program in Grade 10 following completion of your first Driver's Licence exam even if you failed. This is good.
- There will be a 15 year program if you would like a full Licence to practice law. You can also become a Judge eventually.
- The Law Society will issue fines after hearings for any complaints if there is evidence to corroborate the wrong but due to the abuse of the current tribunal processes with no evidence and with false affidavits along with violent attacks and abuses in attempts to steal business names, a fine will be the only penalty and potential criminal prosecution for any theft of client funds or any other activities if criminal in nature.
- Membership is free but you are encouraged to make donations and you will receive honorable mention for doing so. Errors and Omissions Insurance is free also.
- Warren's files need to be returned.^^ He also needs his Kung Fu certificate returned. Warren just wants to get his own brand of powdered, sugarless drink on the shelf that will have special properties. He has no desire to be involved in politics but believes we can conspire to be happy with a Canadian income support of no less than $80,000.00 per Canadian pcy with a 2 % yearly increase.
- There is a future and we can conspire to make the future happy and internationally normal with not only airports designed and renovated to international standards but the income support also must be updated accordingly to international standards, remunerating all citizens.
- The system, its Monarch and its heirs are legitimate and we show obeisance, hoping just to be a happy citizen.
- //////
- LAW SOCIETY ADOPTS RECOMMENDATIONS TO ADDRESS CHALLENGES FACED BY RACIALIZED LICENSEES
- 06 décembre 2016
- At Convocation on December 2, 2016, the Law Society adopted the Final Report of the Challenges Faced by Racialized Licensees Working Group, entitled "Working Together for Change: Strategies to Address Issues of Systemic Racism in the Legal Professions – November 2016." The Report contains 13 recommendations related to five themes: accelerating a culture shift, measuring progress, educating for change, implementing supports, and leading by example.
- The Law Society Working Group on this issue was formed in 2012 to identify the challenges faced by racialized lawyers and paralegals and consider strategies for enhanced inclusion at all career stages. The OBA provided a submission on the Working Group’s previous report, a 2014 Consultation Paper. Subsequently, the Working Group released their Final Report, concluding that the challenges faced by racialized licensees are both longstanding and significant, that the Law Society must take a leadership role in bringing about lasting culture change, and that prescribing minimum standards of equality, diversity and inclusion are consistent with human rights responsibilities of the profession that are already in place.
- The OBA provided a submission responding to the Final Report that recognized the importance of diversity and inclusion to the profession after seeking input from the OBA Equality Committee, Young Lawyers Divisions, Women Lawyers Forum, the Sole, Small Firm and General Practice section, the Canadian Corporate Counsel Association – Ontario Chapter, and our new Student Section. Further, the submission noted the support of the OBA's members for the recommendations articulated in the Final Report as a reasonable way of moving forward to address the concerns identified. The OBA also recognized that, while moving forward is important, the Law Society should do so with the commitment to continually monitor and assess the effectiveness of measures implemented and to share that information with the profession. The OBA will continue to monitor and assess the Law Society's progress in the implementation of the recommendations.
Comments
Post a Comment