Click here for more. ''We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed, by their Creator, with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. We need a consumer, whatever the consumer and the boss does not mind if it's an African or China man as funded with consumer money from their home country; but he says what's wrong if it's an American, all Americans and Canadians that are funded with income support/ consumer money just as the African and China man is funded ? I was inspired by the English man, John Locke, who said that our rights involve life, liberty, health and government. However, is it reasonably foreseeable for McDonalds to contemplate a security risk to its patrons due to a potential bombing at one of its restaurants such that if a bombing ensued, the patrons would be able to claim in Tort in the suggestions that McDonald's should have known? We do not hold such a risk to be self-evident or foreseeable where we would say McDonalds should have known and nor does the passenger in the bus hit in the back by the tractor trailer have any chance to say the bus company should have known it was going to be hit but the bus company who is a victim along with the passengers could say the tractor trailer driver should have known that if he was not careful he would have hit the bus and caused injury since the bus and other vehicles and their passenger should be in the tractor trailers reasonable contemplation. CLICK here.

Click here for more. 

''We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed, by their Creator, with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness.  

We need a consumer, whatever the consumer and the boss does not mind if it's an African or China man as funded with consumer money from their home country; but he says what's wrong if it's an American, all Americans and Canadians that are funded with income support/ consumer money just as the African and China man  is funded ? 

I was inspired by the English man, John Locke, who said that our rights involve life, liberty, health and government.   However, is it reasonably foreseeable for McDonalds to contemplate a security  risk to its patrons due to a potential  bombing at one  of its restaurants such that if a bombing ensued, the patrons would be able to claim in Tort in the suggestions that McDonald's should have known? We do not hold such a risk to be self-evident or foreseeable where we would say McDonalds should have known and nor does the passenger in the bus hit in the back by the tractor trailer have any chance to say the bus company should have known it was going to be hit but the bus company  who is a victim along with the passengers could say the tractor trailer driver should have known that if he was not careful he would have hit the bus and caused injury since the bus and other vehicles and their passenger should be in the tractor trailers reasonable contemplation.  No; McDonalds has a defence in tort that while food injury to customers is in their purview for reasonable contemplation as to the safety of customers, the risk of a terrorist bombing goes beyond the obligations of  location safety imposed by the statute or common law even in McDonald's beautiful Bombay location; What a belle?   The man on the Bombay or the Clapham Omni bus  or sitting on the deck chair in Ibiza would not have had such a bombing in his reasonable contemplation. It is too remote to be foreseeable as to suggest the restaurant bombing victims are owed a duty of care by the restaurant.  Just send questions and pay $500.00 for a Lex Scripta(TM) review at Angel Ronan. Do; please...email w.a.lyon.angelronan@mail.com.   Go to www.angelronan.blogspot.ca since you owe the restaurant costs if you file an action or something like this and you have no law to back you up.    

The learning curve is too evident in North America after all this time. The magna carta was already more than 500 years old before it was ever enshrined in North America for the first time as a founding document and it is  evidence of a borrowed culture that people are still learning to accept a system of legal formalities. I think the guy says that if it's a law, we  have to be tough with the world of intrusions upon our Pangea man independence.

 But, we will ask what is the law, what is the Constitution in America and see if we could  have a new Donald Continental Congress since we could not just hear Ronald Reagan about Tariffs or hear John Bingham since this is how "...I is doing it as Donald." This is because they was trying to tell us as Americans about the UN. But, we wanted to still feel a little independent. Then Donald flexed his bicep and said we got money so we will pay it to all Americans  and Canadians so that we are bigger than "they" are, just as organised with the consumer Money benefits and really feel great again. Don't we feel lousy? You can't say with certainty right now that every North American is taken care of, covered. 

Anyway,  some people did read all of Donoghue vs. Stevenson at their granny's breakfast table while studying at... go to Leicester for Law School and visit London on the weekends. Leicester is just as old and they will beat your resistance(il n'est pas regarder ton avis mais il est regarder le droit et Roi,  le Reine et   Monseigneur  Reid et Thankerton).  Beat your resistance  of law  out of you and only maybe  drink a half pint a day and only half a glass of maybe some wine at dinner or a mini can of Stella Artois.   

Now, don't blow up any more restaurants , hoping to say the restaurant owes you a duty of care.   A terrorist bombing is too remote and nor can the victim in a bombed vehicle sue the driver or owner of the vehicle for damages.  You are trying to see a pattern of who to sue and for what but we are all member's of the same community and we only levy blame or a duty of care  where there is something called moral blameworthiness where you did not think of your neighbor and take reasonable precautions in reasonably foreseeable situations to ameliorate risk of harm to him; your neighbor who is also your patron. 

   

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, as noted by Rousseau,  That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.  We have truly not seen this happiness in the current regime. We have not begins to exploit the current constitution to enjoy the happiness we have therein.  There is truly no need for another constitution at any hour but there is need for a spilt or souls to abandon native Pangea proclivities of resistance and support the constitution and our agreement thereunder. 

At the present time, such principles in organising its powers in such form as to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness makes basic income or consumer money in sufficient quantities requisite to enjoy America as happy again, great again in the industrial and automated world so that all men who are created equal can enjoy the unalienable rights with which they are endowed.  This preamble and the 14th amendment about equality cannot debated by anyone. It's the law and it would only be fallaciously challenged with bravado by those who cannot read. Can he read? He seems to think that equality in the constitution is a new factum in the discourse post slavery but equality is in the origins; not all men were white at the constitutional table and many were coloured but possibly powdered in that culture. 

But, with your trust in Arbitrage  alone and he is very good , you are still campaigning and preparing for an election instead of relying on suggestions from people who may have more breadth to help you see your on going campaign is not independent of some tangible policy platforms that must outlive your one chance to help these ignorant indentured Americans that I love dearly but who believe resisting the common and great  power of the people vested in  their uniform government is a sport.

 Maybe Arbitrage is cut from the cloth of these people and the answer renders the sport redundant since '..isn't the government supposed to show up with Custer and shoot my grandmother?'; she asks.  Maybe they need a pain acknowledged first. and Last Samurai(the movie) is not enough.  Is there an appendage missing and the US government  works to expert this pain, taking capable people hostage either by taking an appendage or all their ID if they would just agree to work. with him as the indentured with the expenses paid and otherwise ..for free? 

You also must see that not every police officer is a graduate although there  is this guy who stole a graduate's shaver... and is wearing his blue suit to feel equal to the graduate and he did not need to do that. You don't need to be a graduate and you should know. Your job is graduation in many ways.  

You cannot  rely on  just the support of people who need to feel someone screaming at logic and screaming at  the emotional hindrances of  indentured servitude legacies  with them and for them and who do not want to understand the solution if or when it requires another government to aid with involvement in our lives; UDHR involvement. The strange facet of American politics is the native reflex to resist government policies that help; whether they are from the Federal government or the UN. But, she is not resisting the newest Dior perfume or the new heels for her day at the Capitol building. Can the President read?   Do they have to be able to read and is he just surrounding himself with people who can't; that  ask us to read the constitution to them every day before they could get into enforcement, take suggestions on how to most efficiently enforce it. Will he ask us to re write the constitution so he can see his name on it only for personal glory when he cannot really read this one? 

 So the Native fighting assimilation and demanding independence may have asked once "...How dare they  give me money to eat, thrive and start a rabbit or bison BBQ?". How dare they, you ask, try to assimilate us and  give us any rules to follow or suggestions on how to dress or how to cook when the independence most of us desired secretly was to walk in skins again with bow and arrow. But you can walk in skins  with money provided. Work was good since it respected my need to feel some independence of this great intrusion on our world and when work is not available due to automation, we would rather return to living off the land if we could  since it agrees with the emotion that cries for independence from this cultural intrusion that began in 1498 approximately  but yet we accept that living off the land is not economically viable for our mutual benefit and we are fully assimilated  to 1 minute burger orders, hot and cold running water  as we build houses. 

 Papa John's or Little Caesar 's 5 minutes or fresh pizza is just brilliant really  and we need the money for gasoline and football games and shampoo and the rent  or mortgages we must pay...no; the mortgage is paid off.   

In fact a basic income/consumer money race instead of an arms race is a better idea in defending our civil liberties and way of life at home and abroad since what is liberty if people are not safe and secure in the evident job attrition and resultant human attrition  caused by  automated labour.   

In all sincerity and  genuine ignorance, we represent our own evils in this highly technological era and may desire secretly to shuffle off this future driven, technological and information dependent coil in our self- imposed tyranny of machine dependent brain atrophy, ignorance.  How would  anyone do this? The only  way is to use less of all the stuff they are asking you to use and wire up to your life and self. But, we would.all.nees to at least play some "Space Invaders."

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed and what more can we suffer after the unemployment caused by government funded industrial automation with AI and  with robotic labor so  the absence of mass basic income per citizen as funded by the Federal government is the one tyranny ; the illogicality.  

The states could run their own basic income policies and they may not be consistent as to citizens qualification. The only qualification is to be a US citizen and resident of that state. That is the law.  In Kansas, you have to have two pets but. It necessarily a family.  

Yet, basic income also known as consumer money benefits after high school would help you feel good so that you might have a date to start a family and if family is what you want to promote with leverage, then  increase the consumer money basic income available for those that have a spouse and increase it again for every child they have. In 2025, you could start with $7000.00 per month for everyone and then add an additional $500.00 per month for those with spouses and an additional $100.00 per month for every child born or registered to the family. 

The gap between the unemployment caused by the attritional affects of automation on one hand  and Consumer Money on the other is called The Grey.   See the movie where our mutual failure and defeat called for a civil war  that is nasty brutish and short  and it arrives like a pack of wolves where you suffer also the attritional affect of a society in economic desperation with people  on the edge of economic survival  for too long; in the cold; a civil  war only  to address  our failure to cooperate with existing law, economic  logic or at least our love for our own families and lives. There is no doubt that we have enough to pay the benefits in sufficient amounts and the more we pay, the more we have in resources from the sales tax generated.   

So, there is no need for invention of an unconditional income support policy in keeping with the methods used in Europe that provides   unconditional income support simply because we do  have that policy but we need to enforce it so that it pays all citizens as required.  The US Constitution and Declaration of Independence was written by inspired American native Creoles as of 1776. I am that Creole and also that would be you. You can call on someone from Canada who threatened UN, US and other laws with drug trafficking but you do not enforce the laws concerning income support when violated by a Canadian or an American governor.   The economy suffers. 

But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”    

Written by The ghost of Freedom's past, the present and near future named Thomas Jefferson.