Skip to main content

Warren solved the Forcillo case and was able to determine under the law that there was no criminal offence committed since he only followed instructions on the job to use deadly force.

Image
By
Warren solved the Forcibllo case and was able to determine under the law that  there was no criminal offense committed since he only followed instructions on the job to use deadly force. Even if he made volitional statements that demonstrated force may not have been necessary, the decision to follow the chain of command exonerates Forcibllo. The chain of command is not criminally culpable for giving the officer an order to use such force as deemed necessary in the genuine fulfillment of the duty to serve and protect public safety and property.  The officer was left to use his judgment in the instance of imminent danger and an obvious threat to public safety in the instant; not in hindsight.  If there is any doubt about the command in light of public protest or outcry, then we could ask what is the best solution. You could sue in Tort from the date you discover you have a right to make a claim. It could be more than 2 years after the incident.   You could impeach the chain of command and proceed with corporate manslaughter before the criminal courts and the officer could be witnesses to the proceeding but the commanding officer would also have to be a party since he gave the order and called in the specially trained officer. But, they could not be charged independently  or as co-accused(at least they should not be ) since they are only servants of the chain of command; the chain of command that is vicariously liable for all of its servants and agents.  If the officer acted alone and independently of any senior authority or chain of command giving him direction, then he could be charged for the alleged offense.  Forciblo Using deadly force as ordered by a commanding officer to stop a citizen in breach of the peace will result in a lawful killing of another under the Queen's peace. It is not an unlawful killing of another. The intention is not lawful and nor is there recklessness. If you cannot understand this, then get a bible that talks about corporate grace or a rule that says McDonalds is not guilty for murder if they put deathly amounts of lead in their burgers.  The offences possibly committed involve...
Anthony's Mischief in relation to computer data
(1.1) Everyone commits mischief who willfully
  • (a) destroys or alters computer data;
  • (b) renders computer data meaningless, useless or ineffective;
  • (c) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with the lawful use of computer data; or
  • (d) obstructs, interrupts or interferes with a person in the lawful use of computer data or denies access to computer data to a person who is entitled to access to it
 or...

Anthony's Identity fraud
  • 403 (1) Everyone commits an offence who fraudulently personates another person, living or dead,
    • (a) with intent to gain advantage for themselves or another person;
    • (b) with intent to obtain any property or an interest in any property;
    • (c) with intent to cause disadvantage to the person being personated or another person; or
    • (d) with intent to avoid arrest or prosecution or to obstruct, pervert or defeat the course of justice.
    • or...
  • Anthony's Criminal Damage
  • or...
  • Anthony's Criminal negligence
    • 219 (1) Every one is criminally negligent who
      • (a) in doing anything, or
      • (b) in omitting to do anything that it is his duty to do,
      shows wanton or reckless disregard for the lives or safety of other persons when he released more than 2 bullets in his exercise of the order to use of deadly force. 
    • Definition of duty
      (2) For the purposes of this section, duty means a duty imposed by law.

Have you heard of a Blasphemous Libel? It is arguably the easiest way to go to jail by making spurious comments about another citizen of professional in public. You could also be sued for loss of reputation.   

Marginal note:Offence

  • 296 (1) Every one who publishes a blasphemous libel is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years.
  • Marginal note:Question of fact
    (2) It is a question of fact whether or not any matter that is published is a blasphemous libel.
  • Marginal note:Saving
    (3) No person shall be convicted of an offence under this section for expressing in good faith and in decent language, or attempting to establish by argument used in good faith and conveyed in decent language, an opinion on a religious subject.
This is because Anthony and others like him wants to justify the choices he made in taking a career path.  He says he chose his career due to racism and does not think any individual should have a faith in society that rises above his assessment and determination of what society will allow someone from a West Indian community to achieve and believe. How can anyone dare to believe they can graduate and be a lawyer or a doctor?  Social workers like him, in his determination, are a cap on black communal self-belief and capability.  He asked personally to kill Black high school graduates and university graduates that have more than a C average.  Who are you to believe you can be a doctor?

Forcillo followed instructions on the job and should be subject only to a disciplinary action for using more than two bullets in a waste of public resources but criminal culpability is out of the question generally speaking since the evidence indicates he was given a command and order that does not seem to indicate he was being called to exercise discretion except to use the deadly force in the absence of a full surrender. If there was surrender, then force was not to be used. 








If you sue in tort you may not be able to succeed as the court will usually block the case on the grounds that it offends public policy. Warren A. Lyon.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

See us on Angel Ronan Entwerfen(TM). We are also SDGCK now. We help Black people. Call to contact us for assistance at our Advice Centre. We help you via the internet. Call and leave us a message at 647-485-5206. Its important that you leave a message. You do not have to make a donation but one is requested. Its free to Jehovah Witness members and is more detailed and thorough than any other service. We can hold your documents and assist you through the whole process. We help White, Black, Yellow, Red and Brown people. Ask for Pam or Lineeka. Write us at info.angelronan@mail.com.

By
   We help Black people. Call to contact us for assistance at our Advice Centre.  We help you via the internet.  Call and leave us a message at 647-485-9558. Its important  that you leave a message.  You do not have to make a donation but one is requested.  Its free to Jehovah Witness members and is more  detailed and thorough than any other service.  We can hold your documents and assist you through the whole process.    We help White, Black,  Yellow,  Red and Brown people.   Ask for Pam or Liteeka or Corinne.  
Post a Comment
Read more

Click here. Lets make North America great again. Angel Ronan Entwerfen Journal: Creolism vs Certainty: Creolism vs Certainty; an Angel Ronan Toshokan Report # 8. Written by Warren Lyon and Seiehaeh Mottha with notes from Eiam Dawn and Craig Daniels. August 7th, 2025. There is a current member of the US House of Representatives and also the the Congress who has not received any income support benefit. There is a member of the Canadian parliament who has not received any income support benefit; probably from Toronto or Peel. The governor of Virginia( part Dutch and part American Native) who was later appointed the Governor of Jamaica arrived at Kingston Harbour in 1664 with his assistant from Vermont. They were both relatively young but the servant was a boy really! about 16 years old but he was capably trained for all tasks. They travelled to Jamaica and when they arrived and got settled the governor cut the boy's foot off to be sure that the boy could not leave and would always be there to provide help and assistance, a part of the governors methods, making the boy kind of a nameless faceless automaton that needs you...just as much as you need him to help you, be there to help you and where would he go, what would he do? But the boy is only one person. Maybe ten are better than one since if one falls down the other nine can help you up. The boy buried his emotions and learned it was best to stay pleasant and never look like anyone had done something to him. What is it like working for someone that you really do detest but you have few options to do anything else; the way this culture works? Nonetheless, he learned to find a passive aggressive way to feel heard, acknowledged or equal by spitting in the food he cooked and served to his employer or any drinks he was asked to prepare so that he could say"...I am you...and you are me" so when you are with your wife or servant girl the odds are you know we could say to the child "...you know I could be your.." and we all have to work hard. Eventually, the governor and the servant boy became washed out by a storm and they learned how to adapt and survive together...as friends but also as servant and master. The governor tended to rely on that one servant as the only one he really knows. The boy was the only one he really knows. He is just a boy. As a Vermontonian, he expected payment for work. The payment did not happen but he was given compliments and reassurance that he would always be his....boy. The man also cut his face to make him kind of faceless and so the boy put wax on the spot. The boy tried to plan a wedding celebration with the servant girl like what he read in the bible and the marooned governor got very angry and behaved badly until the girl his and then the governor said its just that he needed all the boy's attention, needed his help. The governor burned the servant's Vermont citizenship documents to make him kind of nameless. The boy learned other ways to express his feelings. Expression is everything. Slavery was considered unnatural by the Romans under Justinian law. See the "Corpus Juris Civilis". Steven Hawking agrees. Money and Labour The motive behind commerce is money. The motive behind the 14th amendment is commerce and money. We want everyone to benefit equally when they have contributed equally. There is no other way. We could accept that all kinds of human labor became increasingly redundant due to new labor saving technology. We also save money on what the machine does for us. Now that there are fewer people working due to machinery doing work, we find we have less products sold. This is ironic as the products were made by machines with intent to make more profit. So, we decided to give everybody a little money, not a lot, to be sure we make the profit. The little money we give everyone is taken from consumer tax dollars. The money used to retrofit the factories with robots and machines is also taken from consumer tax dollars. When you have black children and white children, you want them to benefit equally in your country and also on your golf course. That is what a good father would do or would he instill a White hegemony since in his story book from the 1700's in Jamaica, he did not really see you in the book as a Moor Berber Priest in England, Italy, in France or Holland or as the architect. But, I suppose its just a book. All we are trying to find is( ..not 11000 votes but...) 11 cents a minute per citizen( 20 cents is preferred ) in North America as the minimum , enforced basic and standard amount of income support. We adapt new phone technology, home appliance technology, food preparation technology where you can just add watts or water to make the pudding or the Cake and we also adapt new humans-less AI work technology and so we adapt money as technology so we can acquire all the other various technologies that make life comfortable. Money as technology is the priority above and beyond all other technologies. Money is technology. In quick summary, watching the US presidencies and American political news television is like seeing a Court jester distracting you from the real issues like comparably equal income support money across North America to assist in balancing out consumer stimulus across the country and to ensure effective profit returns in all states or markets. This is while he hides his own intrinsic pain.

By
  Click here.    Lets make North America great again.    Angel Ronan Entwerfen Journal: Creolism vs Certainty:    Creolism vs Certainty; an Angel Ronan Toshokan Report # 8. Written by Warren Lyon  and Seiehaeh Mottha   with notes from Eiam Dawn and Craig Daniels.   August 7th, 2025.  There is a current member of the US House of Representatives and also the the Congress who has not received any income support benefit. There is a member of the Canadian parliament who has not received any income support benefit; probably from Toronto or Peel. The governor of Virginia( part Dutch and part American Native) who was later appointed the Governor of Jamaica arrived at Kingston Harbour in 1664 with his assistant from Vermont.  They were both relatively young but the servant was a boy really! about 16 years old but he was capably trained for all tasks. They travelled to Jamaica and when they arrived and got settled the...
Post a Comment
Read more

Angel Ronan's New York Contact!

By
Post a Comment
Read more