https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_income_in_the_United_States
This page Basic income in the United States Basic income and negative income tax, which is a related welfare system, has been debated in the United States since the 1960s, and to a smaller extent also before that. During the 1960s and 1970s a number of experiments with negative income tax were conducted in United States and Canada. In the 1970s another and somewhat related welfare system was introduced instead, the Earned Income Tax Credit. The next big development in the history of basic income in the United States came 1982, when The Permanent Fund of Alaska was established. It has delivered some kind of basic income, financed from the states oil and gas revenues, ever since. History Edit Older history (from Paine and Spence to 1900) Edit Arguable the first to propose a system with great similarities to a national basic income in the United States was Thomas Paine, in Agrarian Justice, 1796/1797. His idea was that a few "basic incomes" to young people, in their 20s, financed by tax on heritage, was highly needed and also a matter of justice. Shortly after that, in 1797, Thomas Spence, outlined a complete basic income proposal.[1] 1900-1960 Edit In the first half of the 20th century various people in the United States advocated some kind of basic income. There were for example the Louisiana governor Huey Long who called it "Share Our Wealth" and also some followers of Henry George. There is evidence of a national basic income in North America as provided to all citizens from 1948-1957. It is not clear as to what happened with the program but church growth went up while total automation seems to have been resisted as Toyota truck and Sony electronics sales began across North America. Divorces increased once the program was forestalled. The number of gay citizens also increased. 1960s and 1970s Edit In the 1960s and the 1970s the debate around, and support for, basic income and the related system negative income tax, rose substantially. This debate and interest was highly linked to general debate on poverty and how to deal with it. In 1968, James Tobin, Paul Samuelson, John Kenneth Galbraith and another 1,200 economists signed a document calling for the US Congress to introduce in that year a system of income guarantees and supplements.[2] Milton Friedman endorsed the negative income tax in 1962 and again in 1980,[3] and he connected his support for the negative income tax to support for basic income in an interview with Eduardo Suplicy in 2000.[4] Martin Luther King, a famous civil rights activist and politician, also gave his support for the idea in his book Where Do We Go From Here: Chaos or Community?, published in 1967.[5][6] In 1969, Richard Nixon proposed a "Family Assistance Program" which resembled guaranteed income, in that benefits did not rapidly taper with additional earnings by the beneficiaries. Nixon's proposal only applied to families, but extended previous welfare by benefiting more than those without a 'father'.[7] Other advocates from the 1960s and 1970s include Senator George McGovern who called for a 'demogrant' that was similar to a basic income.[8] From 1968 to 1982, the US and Canadian governments conducted a total of five negative income tax experiments. They were the first major social science experiments in the world. The first experiment was the New Jersey Income Maintenance Experiment, proposed by MIT Economics graduate student Heather Ross in 1967 in a proposal to the U.S. Office of Economic Opportunity.[9] The four experiments were in:[10] The New Jersey Income Maintenance Experiment: Trenton, Passaic, Paterson, and Jersey City, New Jersey with Scranton, Pennsylvania added to increase the number of white families, 1968–1972 (1357 families)[11] The Rural Income Maintenance Experiment: Rural areas in Iowa and North Carolina, 1969–1973 (809 families) Gary, Indiana, 1971–1974 (1800 families) Seattle (SIME) and Denver (DIME), 1971–1982 (4800 families) Manitoba, Canada ("Mincome"), 1974-1979 In general they found that workers would decrease labor supply (employment) by two to four weeks per year because of the guarantee of income equal to the poverty threshold.[12] Permanent fund of Alaska Smaller experiments and initiatives Political parties and other organisations References Last edited 2 minutes ago by an anonymous user RELATED ARTICLES Negative income tax Basic income in Canada Basic income around the world Wikimedia list article Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted. Terms of UsePrivacyDesktop
This page Basic income in the United States Basic income and negative income tax, which is a related welfare system, has been debated in the United States since the 1960s, and to a smaller extent also before that. During the 1960s and 1970s a number of experiments with negative income tax were conducted in United States and Canada. In the 1970s another and somewhat related welfare system was introduced instead, the Earned Income Tax Credit. The next big development in the history of basic income in the United States came 1982, when The Permanent Fund of Alaska was established. It has delivered some kind of basic income, financed from the states oil and gas revenues, ever since. History Edit Older history (from Paine and Spence to 1900) Edit Arguable the first to propose a system with great similarities to a national basic income in the United States was Thomas Paine, in Agrarian Justice, 1796/1797. His idea was that a few "basic incomes" to young people, in their 20s, financed by tax on heritage, was highly needed and also a matter of justice. Shortly after that, in 1797, Thomas Spence, outlined a complete basic income proposal.[1] 1900-1960 Edit In the first half of the 20th century various people in the United States advocated some kind of basic income. There were for example the Louisiana governor Huey Long who called it "Share Our Wealth" and also some followers of Henry George. There is evidence of a national basic income in North America as provided to all citizens from 1948-1957. It is not clear as to what happened with the program but church growth went up while total automation seems to have been resisted as Toyota truck and Sony electronics sales began across North America. Divorces increased once the program was forestalled. The number of gay citizens also increased. 1960s and 1970s Edit In the 1960s and the 1970s the debate around, and support for, basic income and the related system negative income tax, rose substantially. This debate and interest was highly linked to general debate on poverty and how to deal with it. In 1968, James Tobin, Paul Samuelson, John Kenneth Galbraith and another 1,200 economists signed a document calling for the US Congress to introduce in that year a system of income guarantees and supplements.[2] Milton Friedman endorsed the negative income tax in 1962 and again in 1980,[3] and he connected his support for the negative income tax to support for basic income in an interview with Eduardo Suplicy in 2000.[4] Martin Luther King, a famous civil rights activist and politician, also gave his support for the idea in his book Where Do We Go From Here: Chaos or Community?, published in 1967.[5][6] In 1969, Richard Nixon proposed a "Family Assistance Program" which resembled guaranteed income, in that benefits did not rapidly taper with additional earnings by the beneficiaries. Nixon's proposal only applied to families, but extended previous welfare by benefiting more than those without a 'father'.[7] Other advocates from the 1960s and 1970s include Senator George McGovern who called for a 'demogrant' that was similar to a basic income.[8] From 1968 to 1982, the US and Canadian governments conducted a total of five negative income tax experiments. They were the first major social science experiments in the world. The first experiment was the New Jersey Income Maintenance Experiment, proposed by MIT Economics graduate student Heather Ross in 1967 in a proposal to the U.S. Office of Economic Opportunity.[9] The four experiments were in:[10] The New Jersey Income Maintenance Experiment: Trenton, Passaic, Paterson, and Jersey City, New Jersey with Scranton, Pennsylvania added to increase the number of white families, 1968–1972 (1357 families)[11] The Rural Income Maintenance Experiment: Rural areas in Iowa and North Carolina, 1969–1973 (809 families) Gary, Indiana, 1971–1974 (1800 families) Seattle (SIME) and Denver (DIME), 1971–1982 (4800 families) Manitoba, Canada ("Mincome"), 1974-1979 In general they found that workers would decrease labor supply (employment) by two to four weeks per year because of the guarantee of income equal to the poverty threshold.[12] Permanent fund of Alaska Smaller experiments and initiatives Political parties and other organisations References Last edited 2 minutes ago by an anonymous user RELATED ARTICLES Negative income tax Basic income in Canada Basic income around the world Wikimedia list article Content is available under CC BY-SA 3.0 unless otherwise noted. Terms of UsePrivacyDesktop
Comments
Post a Comment