The Missing Files Series( Nickle Dunords): The file involved a burglary charge at Quaker Oats in Manhattan at the main building near 5th Avenue at Foska. See here for more. It is just that we are not having a collision of expectations. So, eventually he was arrested as Nickle Dunords with his co accused who had a separate trial on the incident and was found guilty on an early plea of guilt. Nickle Dunords was not involved at all but was accused by the other party who did plead guilty yet Nickle Dunords remained before the court for some time. He needed some assistance and it happened to be pro bono time at Angel Ronan(TM) where we lots of neat, cool stuff like start a TV station every now and a again and create trademarks that are just snot from the human mucus membrane when you think about how snot is an amazing and powerful human expression that helps you get the cold out and maybe Respicio(TM) has a similar impact on the human being. It helps to HEAL you of your diseases especially in terms of civic expectations. Londinium(TM) has similar healing properties. Now, on Pro Bono Day, you may help the person for what simple amount he can afford. This is written without the usual mathematical reverberation as the theft of this file is dear to you from Scarborough Troglodyte Mango Rios diffidence. If you would but just ask, he would have explained your question if you had a question but you do not have a question. You have a need for education that would enable you to at least understand the immediate risks of incarceration in your presumption. The presumptuousness is the issue and when does a quasi governmental organisation exist in presumptuousness? It fails to exist at that very moment. Now, when they come hand them all of the files and provide the breath/saliva sample so they can see how intoxicated you are on that drug. But, maybe the guy down the road who is turning tricks in stead of selling cheese cakes like Angel Ronan(TM) thought the Nickle Dunords file would be worth more as a legal aid file if he could catch the file in the bush since one unresolved but simple file in the other guy's hand is really in the bush although the file could be resolved by anyone if the file was in the court where the court always has the upper and purposeful hand. The issue is not what the file is worth but who is going to help you and the other guy may say what does it really matter if you can bill legal aid and you get the same result? There will always be lots of legal service providers but just make a choice but do not think that you can just pick up a file as a grade 10 life drop out with an imaginary basketball scholarship at Western and just run the file into court to understand with Nickle Dunords in your good intentioned yet purposeless care since you are trying to understand but you don't and you won't until you get some education or maybe even a book but you do see that, in the end, even after all of the exams and books and essays written that experience is the ultimate teacher for any scout ranger sniper. This is the particular problem we are dealing with since the collision in expectations occurs when the Court's expectation is clear as seen in the magna carta, the charter of rights and freedoms and the evident need to have a safe, secure population under the UNCHR's provisions for the same with a basic income. No trial was required in Nickle Dunords case and the issue is that there is no evidence of Nickle Dunords involvement although we can argue about the solution. Now, at trial if there was a trial the testimony of an already convicted co accused has no probative value. But ultimately, the accused who is still in court must answer the charge before a Judge and he would have to say something if someone led him down that unnecessary path. The reason is he has an alibi and a sworn affidavit from his wife that he was with her on the night in question and not at any burglary. So, all he had to do is come to Court and then we would just throw the affidavit on the ground and walk out or in addition to throwing it on the ground, we would get Big Huge to just intimidate and piss on the court door but the guy down the road would 'legal aid' it and if you choose him to help you, then hear when he says what does it matter or maybe stay with pro bono who would do what he can to help. It looks like the Crown read the file twice and said any evidence of the alibi would be sufficient since, there was no other evidence of Nickle's involvement except for the statement of the co-accused who already pled guilty. The matter was marked 'to be withdrawn' with the evidence of the alibi. In a worst case scenario, Angel Ronan(TM) could eventually schedule a motion or maybe speak to the automated chief crown attorney that went through androidification who would realise that the accusation is not evidence and she has no contact with any witness that was compellable or of any probative value. The only witness was the other accused individual who already pled guilty. You already convicted the co-accused and the jurisprudence here, the math here, 'my people' is simple. Loose that man and let him go.
The Missing Files Series( Nickle Dunords): The file involved a burglary charge at Quaker Oats in Manhattan at the main building near 5th Avenue at Foska. See here for more.
It is just that we are not having a collision of expectations. So, eventually he was arrested as Nickle Dunords with his co accused who had a separate trial on the incident and was found guilty on an early plea of guilt. Nickle Dunords was not involved at all but was accused by the other party who did plead guilty yet Nickle Dunords remained before the court for some time. He needed some assistance and it happened to be pro bono time at Angel Ronan(TM) where we lots of neat, cool stuff like start a TV station every now and a again and create trademarks that are just snot from the human mucus membrane when you think about how snot is an amazing and powerful human expression that helps you get the cold out and maybe Respicio(TM) has a similar impact on the human being. It helps to HEAL you of your diseases especially in terms of civic expectations. Londinium(TM) has similar healing properties. Now, on Pro Bono Day, you may help the person for what simple amount he can afford. This is written without the usual mathematical reverberation as the theft of this file is dear to you from Scarborough Troglodyte Mango Rios diffidence. If you would but just ask, he would have explained your question if you had a question but you do not have a question. You have a need for education that would enable you to at least understand the immediate risks of incarceration in your presumption. The presumptuousness is the issue and when does a quasi governmental organisation exist in presumptuousness? It fails to exist at that very moment. Now, when they come hand them all of the files and provide the breath/saliva sample so they can see how intoxicated you are on that drug.
But, maybe the guy down the road who is turning tricks in stead of selling cheese cakes like Angel Ronan(TM) thought the Nickle Dunords file would be worth more as a legal aid file if he could catch the file in the bush since one unresolved but simple file in the other guy's hand is really in the bush although the file could be resolved by anyone if the file was in the court where the court always has the upper and purposeful hand. The issue is not what the file is worth but who is going to help you and the other guy may say what does it really matter if you can bill legal aid and you get the same result? There will always be lots of legal service providers but just make a choice but do not think that you can just pick up a file as a grade 10 life drop out with an imaginary basketball scholarship at Western and just run the file into court to understand with Nickle Dunords in your good intentioned yet purposeless care since you are trying to understand but you don't and you won't until you get some education or maybe even a book but you do see that, in the end, even after all of the exams and books and essays written that experience is the ultimate teacher for any scout ranger sniper. This is the particular problem we are dealing with since the collision in expectations occurs when the Court's expectation is clear as seen in the magna carta, the charter of rights and freedoms and the evident need to have a safe, secure population under the UNCHR's provisions for the same with a basic income. No trial was required in Nickle Dunords case and the issue is that there is no evidence of Nickle Dunords involvement although we can argue about the solution. Now, at trial if there was a trial the testimony of an already convicted co accused has no probative value. But ultimately, the accused who is still in court must answer the charge before a Judge and he would have to say something if someone led him down that unnecessary path. The reason is he has an alibi and a sworn affidavit from his wife that he was with her on the night in question and not at any burglary. So, all he had to do is come to Court and then we would just throw the affidavit on the ground and walk out or in addition to throwing it on the ground, we would get Big Huge to just intimidate and piss on the court door but the guy down the road would 'legal aid' it and if you choose him to help you, then hear when he says what does it matter or maybe stay with pro bono who would do what he can to help. It looks like the Crown read the file twice and said any evidence of the alibi would be sufficient since, there was no other evidence of Nickle's involvement except for the statement of the co-accused who already pled guilty. The matter was marked 'to be withdrawn' with the evidence of the alibi. In a worst case scenario, Angel Ronan(TM) could eventually schedule a motion or maybe speak to the automated chief crown attorney that went through androidification who would realise that the accusation is not evidence and she has no contact with any witness that was compellable or of any probative value. The only witness was the other accused individual who already pled guilty. You already convicted the co-accused and the jurisprudence here, the math here,
'my people' is simple. Loose that man and let him go.

The Charter of Rights and Freedoms
It is just that we are not having a collision of expectations. So, eventually he was arrested as Nickle Dunords with his co accused who had a separate trial on the incident and was found guilty on an early plea of guilt. Nickle Dunords was not involved at all but was accused by the other party who did plead guilty yet Nickle Dunords remained before the court for some time. He needed some assistance and it happened to be pro bono time at Angel Ronan(TM) where we lots of neat, cool stuff like start a TV station every now and a again and create trademarks that are just snot from the human mucus membrane when you think about how snot is an amazing and powerful human expression that helps you get the cold out and maybe Respicio(TM) has a similar impact on the human being. It helps to HEAL you of your diseases especially in terms of civic expectations. Londinium(TM) has similar healing properties. Now, on Pro Bono Day, you may help the person for what simple amount he can afford. This is written without the usual mathematical reverberation as the theft of this file is dear to you from Scarborough Troglodyte Mango Rios diffidence. If you would but just ask, he would have explained your question if you had a question but you do not have a question. You have a need for education that would enable you to at least understand the immediate risks of incarceration in your presumption. The presumptuousness is the issue and when does a quasi governmental organisation exist in presumptuousness? It fails to exist at that very moment. Now, when they come hand them all of the files and provide the breath/saliva sample so they can see how intoxicated you are on that drug.
But, maybe the guy down the road who is turning tricks in stead of selling cheese cakes like Angel Ronan(TM) thought the Nickle Dunords file would be worth more as a legal aid file if he could catch the file in the bush since one unresolved but simple file in the other guy's hand is really in the bush although the file could be resolved by anyone if the file was in the court where the court always has the upper and purposeful hand. The issue is not what the file is worth but who is going to help you and the other guy may say what does it really matter if you can bill legal aid and you get the same result? There will always be lots of legal service providers but just make a choice but do not think that you can just pick up a file as a grade 10 life drop out with an imaginary basketball scholarship at Western and just run the file into court to understand with Nickle Dunords in your good intentioned yet purposeless care since you are trying to understand but you don't and you won't until you get some education or maybe even a book but you do see that, in the end, even after all of the exams and books and essays written that experience is the ultimate teacher for any scout ranger sniper. This is the particular problem we are dealing with since the collision in expectations occurs when the Court's expectation is clear as seen in the magna carta, the charter of rights and freedoms and the evident need to have a safe, secure population under the UNCHR's provisions for the same with a basic income. No trial was required in Nickle Dunords case and the issue is that there is no evidence of Nickle Dunords involvement although we can argue about the solution. Now, at trial if there was a trial the testimony of an already convicted co accused has no probative value. But ultimately, the accused who is still in court must answer the charge before a Judge and he would have to say something if someone led him down that unnecessary path. The reason is he has an alibi and a sworn affidavit from his wife that he was with her on the night in question and not at any burglary. So, all he had to do is come to Court and then we would just throw the affidavit on the ground and walk out or in addition to throwing it on the ground, we would get Big Huge to just intimidate and piss on the court door but the guy down the road would 'legal aid' it and if you choose him to help you, then hear when he says what does it matter or maybe stay with pro bono who would do what he can to help. It looks like the Crown read the file twice and said any evidence of the alibi would be sufficient since, there was no other evidence of Nickle's involvement except for the statement of the co-accused who already pled guilty. The matter was marked 'to be withdrawn' with the evidence of the alibi. In a worst case scenario, Angel Ronan(TM) could eventually schedule a motion or maybe speak to the automated chief crown attorney that went through androidification who would realise that the accusation is not evidence and she has no contact with any witness that was compellable or of any probative value. The only witness was the other accused individual who already pled guilty. You already convicted the co-accused and the jurisprudence here, the math here,
'my people' is simple. Loose that man and let him go.






Comments
Post a Comment