The confusion is that a father's or mother's motive to interrupt a child's life is really abuse when the child is now an adult but the child's house keys are stolen and copied and sold to anyone requesting a copy, mail is stolen and vehicles are damaged while the father is holding on to a Pangean right in his emotions and presumption to have a certain feeling in relation to that adult and who in any event is not to be a subject of any such criminal abuses whether or not he was under the age of 20. What is worse, I can tolerate West Indian people, possibly orphans, who seem to want to sabotage people they think are in their community and who work very hard and who also, somehow, infiltrate families trying to adopt the parents only hoping to say the parents gave them the family properties and the parents are killed after they are willing to give any of their children's possessions to this stranger among us. I saw it happen before and did my best to contain my disapp...