Skip to main content

Posts

Warren A. Lyon took this photo! Send your question to the android using the portal above.

Warren A. Lyon  took this photo!  Send your question to the android using the portal above.
/Our Android answers: $80.00. Our Android is happy to assist; with home work. His name is Buenosio.

Angel Ronan LEx Scripta(TM) Service. Call today.

Angel Ronan  LEx Scripta(TM)  Service.  Call today.
New Address: DEV Hub for all meetings at Spadina, Toronto.

Angel Ronan(TM) LEx Scripta Service. Call today so we can answer your question.

Angel Ronan(TM)  LEx Scripta  Service.  Call today so we can answer your question.
Warren A. Lyon in this photo; Litigator, Consultant.

These photos were taken in Holland. Angel Ronan(TM) Photo Guide.

This photo is entitled ''AFFETTO.'' This photo is a gift to all mothers this Christmas. This free photo can be downloaded, framed, hanged and printed. This is the Christmas Gift from Angel Ronan Photo Guide; Ho! Ho! Ho! It's Santa Claus y'all so open up your door! Download this photo. It is made available to you for free! If you believe you are an Heir to the estate of...Angel Ronan, then this photo is all that is left and you have now inherited. This is inheritance if you download and frame this photo. If you would like to sell the photo, then contact me and when you have sold $100.00 worth, you can arrange to send me $50.00. Be Happy!

You see, education may not be a legal requirement in what ever part deh you come from but it might help when your mother country will sabotage you and steal business documents to impeach you as they buy the government administration in German to get your attention as a Lawyer in Germany to show you what gremlin work they can do at 10 times the cost of your education only to bring you back to ask if you can budget and play social games around you and ask if you know certain fruits and then ask if they are equal since education might help you to do more than budget but calculate. Now quit hoping I will make a mistake on a blog page. The website is not the company. Good; now go. After we budget for the value of your non formally educated relative's intelligence and decide he is superior since it is the only right answer while you cannot say so since he will think you are being fascicious, facetious that is, but you have to show them you are capable as in a good employee and thankful family member who is not stupid enough to open the door to strangers. After that, he said you need to budget for the value of human life with or without formal education.

You see, education may not be a legal requirement in what ever part deh you come from but it might help when your mother country will sabotage you and steal business documents to impeach you as they buy the government administration in German to get your attention as a Lawyer in Germany to show you what gremlin work they can do at 10 times the cost of your education only to  bring you back to ask if you can budget and play social games around you and ask if you know certain fruits and then ask if they are equal since education might help you to do more than budget but calculate.  Now quit hoping I will make a mistake on a blog page. The website is not the company.  Good;  now go.   After we budget for the value of your non formally educated relative's  intelligence and decide he is superior since it is the only right answer while you cannot say so since he will think you are  being fascicious, facetious that is,  but you have to show them yo...

Can a quasi governmental body without the power of arrest violate your s.7 charter rights contrary to their mandate to regulate a profession? The answer is yes. The answer is "yes" because anybody can knowingly or recklessly break the law. Yet, their mandate is not an alibi. The violation is an offense; a criminal offence. The mandate is to regulate a profession and no Law is to be broken to achieve this end. Regulating roads are more complicated and no laws need to be broken to regulate roads. The RCMP has been found in violation of s.7 and s.8 when the procedures that govern their work is not followed by employees who my have hoped to continue their work with the investigation against the subject and there is no quasi governmental body funded by the government claiming to be self-regulating a profession that has immunity above and beyond the power of the constable services and the legislature dedicated to serve and protect. False affidavits as to service of documents and as to communicating information by email although the wrong email address was used admittedly on the record amounts to criminal MISFEASANCE in public office and a deliberate breach of S.7 and an interference with the professional's right to enjoy employment under the true, North,strong and free laws of a UN charter nation.

Can a quasi governmental body without the power of arrest violate your s.7 charter rights contrary to their mandate to regulate a profession? The answer is yes. The answer is "yes" because anybody can knowingly or recklessly break the law.  Yet, their mandate is not an alibi. The violation is an offense; a criminal offence. The mandate is to regulate a profession and no Law is to be broken to achieve this end. Regulating roads are more complicated and no laws need to be broken to regulate roads.  The RCMP has been found in violation of s.7 and s.8 when the procedures that govern their work is not followed by employees who my have hoped to continue their work with the investigation  against the subject and there is no quasi governmental body funded by the government claiming to be self-regulating a profession that has immunity above and beyond the power of the constable services and the legislature  dedicated to serve and protect. False affidavits as to service of do...

The human cockroaches have drawn their battle lines against the laws of our civilization and they use a Lawyer or law graduate quite often to demonstrate their battle against these laws. What happened?

The human cockroaches have  drawn their battle lines against the laws of our civilization and they use a Lawyer or law graduate quite often to demonstrate their battle against these laws.   What happened? 

Merry Christmas and Happy Hanukkah from Angel Ronan(TM) Services. These photos are posted as a courtesy as made available.

According to the EU. we are all refugees in this world and entitled to the honor to be afforded to refugees but as citizens first and foremost in our intelligent and humane world.

According to the EU. we are all refugees in this world and entitled to the honor to be afforded to refugees but as citizens first and foremost in our intelligent and humane world.  

UDHR Video Article 25 English Achim Steiner

This is the City Crusade for Christ Meeting for this week. The Change that Changes Everything

Affetto Ronan(TM) Is a new trademark at Lex Scripta(TM).

Former Manchester United Star Nani Scores Epic Wondergoal For Sporting

Comba is the appropriate jurisprudence; it is argued. From the Angel Ronan Lex Scripta Law Library; A discussion on United States of America v. Shephard, 1976 CanLII 8 (SCC), [1977] 2 S.C.R. 1067, at p. 1080. Simply put, USA vs. Shephard is really the standard used by an extradition Judge as to whether there is evidence for a society seeking justice and extradition of an accused to weigh the evidence following a full investigation, disclosure to the accused and a proper determination and hearing of the evidence at the highest standards in a properly constructed Criminal Law Court using the appropriate tests for weighing such evidence. As such, Shephard follows Hernandez purposefully. The Preliminary Hearing Judge is an elevated pre-trial Judge with an opportunity for a full hearing of the evidence as applied to the Crown Onus and the standard of proof with what detail on the Crown brief is contained therein as from the events as alleged in a sworn, prepared, information that represents the closed summation of the police service's due diligence. It is not a fact finding mission. The R. vs. Comba is the test in the appropriate analysis for a preliminary inquiry or pre-trial Judge. Shephard and Hernandez are not to be used in their pre trial or preliminary inquiry court forum.

See   R.  v . Arcuri, [2001] 2 SCR 828, 2001 SCC 54 at paragraph 14  to paragraph 16 seen here below: 14                                Lampkin Prov. J. began by citing this Court’s decision in  United   States   of   America   v .  Shephard ,  1976 CanLII 8 (SCC) ,  [1977] 2 S.C.R. 1067 , at p. 1080 , which held that a preliminary inquiry justice is “required to commit an accused person for trial in any case in which there is admissible evidence which could, if it were believed, result in a conviction”.  He then  stated  that the application  of  the  Shephard  test to the facts  of  particular cases “has brought sharp disagreement even at the highest level”: para. 75.  In support  of  this proposition, he cited this Court’s decision in  R.  v ...

TOKYO【Christmas Lights】Shinjuku station - Part 2. Around East Entrance....

Mission Impossible Train Scene HD! (1080p)

Let's Go Gifting! | Nordstrom Holiday 2018

School of Oriental and African Studies, London, United Kingdom, John Stock Photo: 23731485 - Alamy alamy.com Download this stock image: School of Oriental and African Studies, London, United Kingdom, John McAslan and Partners, School of oriental and African Studies, University of London.