It should not be necessary to discuss competing oaths and any jurisprudence that has arisen since the real issue is remembering the right for the trier of fact to make his own finding. The only issue is the onus on the Crown to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. Yet, the uncorrobated evidence of one witnes vs. The testimony of the other and also accused is not enough to prove the matter. The Crown is aware of this and outside of the trial forum or inside of that forum, the matter still cannot be proven and so a trial should not be available but, Warren is not at Law School. He has graduated. -un·cor·rob·o·rat·ed-

It should not be necessary to discuss competing oaths and any jurisprudence that has arisen since the real issue is remembering the right for the trier of fact to make his own finding. The only issue is the onus on the Crown to prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt. Yet, the uncorrobated evidence of one witnes vs. The testimony of the other and also accused is not enough to prove the matter. The Crown is aware of this and outside of the trial forum or inside of that forum, the matter still cannot be proven and so a trial should not be available but, Warren is not at Law School. He has graduated.    
       
-un·cor·rob·o·rat·ed-