Angel Ronan Toshokan ™ Law Centre: Services (by Donation Only) Consulting and Management.

Posts

Showing posts from 2019

Angel Ronan(TM) is not a symbol of English hegemony but an indication of West Indian involvement. There are several such businesses like this certainly.

According to the new definition of individuals who have significant control of the corporation or ISC under the updated CBCA rules, members of Angel Ronan Lex Scripta do not satisfy the definition. No register is required. They satisfy the definition of control person under "Control Person" in the Farlex Financial Dictionary. An important person in a corporation. Control persons include senior managers, members of the board of directors, and officers such as the CEO and CFO. Control persons are able to use both their authority and their influence to make decisions on the corporation's activities. A control person is also called an affiliated person. Farlex Financial Dictionary. © 2012 Farlex, Inc. All Rights Reserved

According to the new definition of individuals who have significant control of the corporation or ISC under the updated CBCA rules, members of Angel Ronan Lex Scripta do not satisfy the definition. No register is required. They satisfy the definition of control person under " Control Person" in the Farlex Financial Dictionary. An important person in a corporation . Control persons include senior managers, members of the board of directors , and officers such as the CEO and CFO . Control persons are able to use both their authority and their influence to make decisions on the corporation's activities. A control person is also called an affiliated person. Farlex Financial Dictionary. © 2012 Farlex, Inc. All Rights Reserved

Kingston Gleaner Newspaper Archives, Feb 16, 2006, p. 17 https://newspaperarchive.com/kingston-gleaner-feb-16-2006-p-17/ Feb 16, 2006 - Rattray Mrs. Cynthia Small served as office manager of Rattray Patterson Rattray ... Here with her on the occasion of her retirement in 2004 are (from left) her son ... The legal Arm ofRattray Patterson THE LIFE OF ALFRED RATTRAY ... In addition to his practice of the law, AlfredRattray was a Lecturer and ... You've visited this page 3 times. Last visit: 08/06/18

<a href="https://newspaperarchive.com/kingston-gleaner-feb-16-2006-p-17/"></a> Kingston Gleaner Newspaper Archives, Feb 16, 2006, p. 17 https://newspaperarchive.com/kingston-gleaner-feb-16-2006-p-17/ Feb 16, 2006 - Rattray Mrs . Cynthia Small served as office manager of Rattray Patterson Rattray ... Here with her on the occasion of her retirement in 2004 are (from left) her son ... The legal Arm of Rattray Patterson THE LIFE OF ALFRED RATTRAY ... In addition to his practice of the law , Alfred Rattray was a Lecturer and ... You've visited this page 3 times. Last visit: 08/06/18 Kingston Gleaner Newspaper Archives, Feb 16, 2006, p. 17 https://newspaperarchive.com/kingston-gleaner-feb-16-2006-p-17/ Feb 16, 2006 - Rattray Mrs . Cynthia Small served as office manager of Rattray Patterson Rattr...

A corporation becomes dormant when it is no longer active. It cannot be re-registered. If the only director is deceased, he is unable to maintain the corporate responsibility of yearly reports and returns. As such, it is dormant. It is much like a person who is deceased and cannot re register his driver's license or his passport. Did you know Angel Ronan(TM) is available for $1.00? Call today. Please read the following case on corporate responsibility and a Director's fiduciary duty. ------------ Regina v. Ben Smith Regina v. Harry Smith, 1962 CanLII 100 (ON CA) Document History (0) Cited Documents (18) Cited by (16) CanLII Connects (0) PDF Date: 1962-09-04 Other citations: [1963] 1 OR 249 — 36 DLR (2d) 613 —[1963] 1 CCC 68 — 38 CR 378 Citation: Regina v. Ben Smith Regina v. Harry Smith, 1962 CanLII 100 (ON CA), , retrieved on 2019-06-11 Regina v. Ben Smith Regina v. Harry Smith [1963] 1 O.R. 249-271 ONTARIO [COURT OF APPEAL] PORTER, C.J.O., ROACH AND MCLENNAN, JJ.A. 4th SEPTEMBER 1962. Criminal law -- Theft -- Directors of company purchasing stock with company funds and pledging with bank as security for personal overdraft -- Cr. Code, s. 269(1). Accused, who were directors of B comapny, were convicted of stealing certain shares belonging to B company by pledging them with a bank to secure a personal overdraft. On evidence that accused, without the knowledge of the other directors and without any authority from the company, used company funds to purchase the shares in question which they then used, in circumstances involving secrecy, deceit and risk of harm to the company, to pledge with the bank for their own personal use, held, on appeal, that accused were properly convicted of theft under s. 269(1)(a) of the Criminal Code, 1953-54 (Can.), c. 51, in that they did "fraudulently...convert [the shares]...with intent to deprive, temporarily or absolutely, the owner...or a person who has a special *Leave to appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada refused November 5, 1962. property or interest [therein]" and it was immaterial that the accused, who certainly were not bailees of the shares, might have honestly intended, with reasonable prospects, to redeem the shares and pay back the company. It was also a conspiracy to commit murder when some wanted to know what happens to the business name if the only owner ended up dead. It is not an offence to collect money as a group for a wedding gift or to buy the new church land or property but it is an offence to collect money while intending only to see the owner dead. If he is dead, how can he sign a document to register your group as the new owner. You can buy Angel Ronan(TM) for $1.00 by emailing w.a.Lyon.angelronan@mail.com or phoning 1-914-539-7655. Any sums above $1.00 is unrequested gift. So, there is no need to have your entire group investigated as people who give money to own a business or rent a condo for ten months or more but do not have any contract. You may be more handsome than the current owner but your handsomeness is not reason to do anything illegally and nor is it reason to hope it can be done improperly. If the owner is dead, re registration of the name to someone else is blocked. Regina v. Ben Smith Regina v. Harry Smith, 1962 CanLII 100 (ON CA)

A corporation becomes dormant when it is no longer active. It cannot be re-registered. If the only director is deceased, he is unable to maintain the corporate responsibility of yearly reports and returns. As such, it is dormant. It is much like a person who is deceased and cannot re register his driver's license or his passport. Did you know Angel Ronan(TM) is available for $1.00? Call today. Please read the following case on corporate responsibility and a Director's fiduciary duty. ------------ Regina v. Ben Smith Regina v. Harry Smith, 1962 CanLII 100 (ON CA) Document History (0) Cited Documents (18) Cited by (16) CanLII Connects (0) PDF Date: 1962-09-04 Other citations: [1963] 1 OR 249 — 36 DLR (2d) 613 —[1963] 1 CCC 68 — 38 CR 378 Citation: Regina v. Ben Smith Regina v. Harry Smith, 1962 CanLII 100 (ON CA), , retrieved on 2019-06-11 Regina v. Ben Smith Regina v. Harry Smith [1963] 1 O.R. 249-271 ONTARIO [C...

Compartes La Propiedad(TM is a new trademark at Angel Ronan

Pizza, Rea, Cook, Trabajarparate (TM) is a new trademark at Angel Ronan.

In Psalms 111, we see the promise to Israel of a homeland is fulfilled. It was not just land belonging to others but a land once made home by Abraham, Isaac and Jacob(Israel). Yet, this is not permission to presume God has given you the right to take property and land belonging to others. Abraham left his ancestral land and ended up immediately within the gates of Egypt as a guest and benefactor of a Pharaoh. Israel today was not just any land but the land of Abraham's people and before Moses left Egypt, some other tribes occupied the promised land temporarily in Jacob's absence. As such, it would be anathema for Israel to just claim other people's land today. The purpose of Israel is to witness about the ten commandments. -Ten commandments- The ten commandments confirm that we honor our neighbours and what belongs to them; including their land. We see in history that for sometime Israel, as a political entity, no longer existed. -Historical fact as recorded in the bible- We see the historical fact of Israel's occupation confirmed in the bible. See Hezekiah and the Assyrians. See the occupation of Israel by the Romans in the first century A.D. See the story of Nehemiah. There is no doubt that Israel was to exist and left Egypt as a people with great abundance. See Deuteronomy 15. As the Egyptians blessed them when the time of Israel's labor in Egypt ended, the Egyptians blessed them in honor of a principle. -Hebrew is a rich language- Hebrew is a rich language. The OHCHR is a rich nation's economic strategy as they make Arrangements to work with Canada and the United States to benefit from Automaton and a vast existing infrastructure in need of investment, a vital domestic market and modernisation. Warren A. Lyon.

In Psalms 111, we see the promise to Israel of a homeland is fulfilled. It was not just land belonging to others but a land once made home by Abraham, Isaac and Jacob(Israel). Yet, this is not permission to presume God has given you the right to take property and land belonging to others. Abraham left his ancestral land and ended up immediately within the gates of Egypt as a guest and benefactor of a Pharaoh. Israel today was not just any land but the land of Abraham's people and before Moses left Egypt, some other tribes occupied the promised land temporarily in Jacob's absence. As such, it would be anathema for Israel to just claim other people's land today. The purpose of Israel is to witness about the ten commandments. -Ten commandments- The ten commandments confirm that we honor our neighbours and what belongs to them; including their land. We see in history that for sometime Israel, as a political entity, no longer existed. -Historical fact as recor...

AMERICANS WHO LOVE UK FOOD! | First impressions of the UK - Postmodern F...

THE BEST SUNDAY ROAST! | The Postmodern Family EP#80

OATH vs. Oath Jurisprudence is much like Legere and R v. W(D). 2+2, -1+5,3+1 and 7-3 all add up to 4. It is Another way to communicate the jurisprudence of R v. W(D) rather. It is not new jurisprudence. It is based on the same principle as R v. Legere(1995). See this analysis again in Sklar v. Borys, 1917 CanLII 121 (SK QB). This is summarised again in the following. The Oath vs. Oath jurisprudence is seen in the UK legal tradition dating back to 1877 in the case of Anderson v. Titmas(1877): Young v. Kershaw (1899), 81 L.T. 531 (which was followed in Varette's case, Varette v. Sainsbury) Smith L.J., stated at p. 532: "Further, it would only amount to oath against oath, and that is not enough," as was pointed out in Anderson v. Titmas (1877), 36 L.T. 711, by Huddleston, B.

OATH vs. Oath Jurisprudence is much like Legere and R v. W(D). 2+2, -1+5,3+1 and 7-3 all add up to 4. It is Another way to communicate the jurisprudence of R v. W(D) rather. It is not new jurisprudence. It is based on the same principle as R v. Legere(1995). See this analysis again in Sklar v. Borys, 1917 CanLII 121 (SK QB). This is summarised again in the following. The Oath vs. Oath jurisprudence is seen in the UK legal tradition dating back to 1877 in the case of Anderson v. Titmas(1877): Young v. Kershaw (1899), 81 L.T. 531 (which was followed in Varette's case; see Varette v. Sainsbury) Smith L.J., stated at p. 532: "Further, it would only amount to oath against oath, and that is not enough," as was pointed out in Anderson v. Titmas (1877), 36 L.T. 711, by Huddleston, B.

Warren thanks the older lawyers whose mentoring and advice was helpful when approaching the unique facts of this file. One or two Canadian lecturers also helped. Former Caribana now called Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival Toronto

https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2011/05/25/former_caribana_now_called_scotiabank_caribbean_carnival_toronto.html Former Caribana now called Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival Toronto By HENRY STANCU STAFF REPORTER Wed., May 25, 2011 It’s more of a mouthful than it used to be. Caribana, the celebration of Caribbean culture that brings more than a million people to the streets of Toronto each summer, has a new name. The 44th annual event will now be known as the Scotiabank Caribbean Carnival Toronto, organizers announced Wednesday. Cyrese King, centre in red, dances on Lake Shore Blvd. during the Caribana Parade in Toronto on Aug. 2, 2008. (AARON HARRIS / CANADIAN PRESS FILE PHOTO) Mike Colle, MPP for Eglinton-Lawrence, announced a $400,000 provincial “investment” in the carnival. Councilor Joe Mihevc said the city will contribute “just under $500,000 in cash as well as $100,000 of relief of permit fees.” The name change, ord...

Angel Ronan Toshokan ™ Law Centre: Services (by Donation Only) Consulting and Management.

Search This Blog

Posts

Blog authors

Warren A. Lyon took this photo! Send your question to the android using the portal above.

Angel Ronan LEx Scripta(TM) Service. Call today.

Angel Ronan(TM) LEx Scripta Service. Call today so we can answer your question.