Someone may want you to sue due to something they may have done, but how can you sue if you dont know the issues as to the potential law suit? A new article will discuss limitation periods in spite of all the social anticipation for a football coach's or a police comnander's misdeeds that someone believes is clearly a breach of a duty of care. There could be social anticipation for a David and Goliath legal match but with the evidence of wrong doing in the public and all the social anticipation, David already won. So, who is to tell David, in spite of his skill, when he has all the evidence of Mccrachan's criminal malfeasance in office? She is not stepping down. She is fired for conspiracy to murder contrary to the Queen's peace. She is to be wisked and beheaded for violating the sacred oaths of office and insulting the Queen in office. There is only one monarch in Charles' and the Queen's Kingdom. If a student wrote an critical, intelligent essay. It is honored and open discussions are critical for on going systemic feedback in the systems of justice.

Someone may want you to sue due to something they may have done, but how can you sue if you don't know the issues as to the potential law suit? A new article will discuss limitation periods in spite of all the social anticipation for a football coach's or a police commander's misdeeds that someone believes is clearly a breach of a duty of care. There could be social anticipation for a David and Goliath legal match but with the evidence of wrong doing in the public and all the social anticipation, David already won. So, who is to tell David, in spite of his skill, when he has all the evidence of Mccrachan's criminal malfeasance in office?  She is not stepping down.   She is fired for conspiracy to murder contrary to the Queen's peace. She is to be wisked and beheaded for violating the sacred oaths of office and insulting the Queen in office. There is only one monarch in Charles' and the Queen's Kingdom.  If a student wrote an critical, intelligent essay that honors the court is applauded. This is also the same for those academic lawyers who honor the court and the purity of good, balanced unbiassed justice vs. patronage biased justice or caddy playboy justice.