"Good policy precede the laws to enforce it. We honor the purpose of the policy with legislation that implements the policy. Richard Coudenhove-Kalergi": Ideological Father of the EU. The issues of regimes and the law came to the fore in one of our cases while there was clear and precise law involving various steps in the daily application of the legislation to the scenarios and subject matter governed that will not be mentioned here to respect a client's privilege. Our position was to see the application of the law as it would be interpreted in any reading of the clear, precise terminology. However, without any other existing cases related to the new legislation and its reading, the only case on the matter referenced the old and repealed statute and mentioned a common law regime in the application of that old, repealed code. This may happen and in short appearances, a Court may see its answer but may not be fully equipped to achieve the just result on the first opportunity to interpret the code in Court and it could seem obvious to all based on the legislation alone but the use of Hansard on Appeal is what happens usually to be fare to The Court and the parties. A New reading of the matter is possible on further applications with Hansard read as may be required and that may take research with the Court's open jurisdiction to give effect to what may be, in some opinions, an obvious intention and this will take filing fees and any costs that must be paid in accordance to previous and related orders, if any, before the Court is fully able to render it's judgement and fairly to all that are interested in that well intentioned result.
Comments
Post a Comment